[SixClub] ARRL needs to wake up ......

[N4PGW (Buck)]

Actually, it=92s a very good time.  Think about it, no one can hear you =
so no
one complains thus justification in taking it over before the others =
find
out its too late to do anything about it.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: sixclub-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:sixclub-
> bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Richard Joey Fiero II W5TFW
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 9:20 AM
> To: kd4e at verizon.net; World Wide Six Meter Club
> Subject: Re: [SixClub] ARRL needs to wake up ......
>=20
>=20
> Seems to me that if the bands are dead now, and the cycle low its a =
VERY
> BAD
> time to be doing such things,
>=20
>=20
>                     Joey
> Subject: Re: [SixClub] ARRL needs to wake up ......
>=20
>=20
> > >>> The frequencies we are using for our 6M OFDM HSMM
> > >>> testing are between 50.3 - 50. 8 MHz with the FCC
> > >>> Experimental License of WC9XLP. No testing is
> > >>> planned for 2M at this time.
> > >>>
> > >>> To date we have received no complaints of any QRM
> > >>> whatsoever.
> > >>>
> > >>> 73, John Champa - K8OCL
> > >>> ARRL Chairman
> > >>> HSMM Working Group
> >
> > Was anyone aware that the ARRL sought and received an
> > experimental license for wide-band digital modes on 6M?
> >
> > Are they really using an established 6M voice Calling
> > Frequency 50.400 for the testing of digital modes?
> >
> > Are they IDing using CW or voice so Hams know what
> > they are hearing and from whom?
> >
> > What power levels and how frequently into what sort
> > of 6M antennas?
> >
> > Are they setting up a network of 6M digital mode
> > repeaters?
> >
> > Here is an ARRL description of the mode but it is all
> > about microwave frequencies, no mention of 6M.
> > http://www.ceitron.com/mvus/hsmm1003.html
> >
> > The site mentions some sort of survey that claims
> > a high level of endorsement from licensed Hams.
> >
> > "A survey conducted by the ARRL Technology Task Force,
> > of League members and other amateurs revealed that the
> > number one amateur radio interest in new technologies
> > was in high-speed digital radio networks."  (Pre-2001)
> >
> > The site does not mention asking the frequent users
> > of 6M for their input.  Has anyone heard from the ARRL?
> >
> > Just wondering ...
> >
> > 73, doc KD4E
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > SixClub mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sixclub
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> > Post: mailto:SixClub at mailman.qth.net
> >
>=20
>=20
> ______________________________________________________________
> SixClub mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sixclub
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:SixClub at mailman.qth.net
>=20
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.11/493 - Release Date:
> 10/23/2006
>=20

--=20
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.11/493 - Release Date: =
10/23/2006
=20