[SixClub] FM simplex

[Gabriel Sierra]

Hi all,

I don't know what is the problem with the 0.5 meg
splits, really. It has not been hard to implement here
in FK68 land, and it gives more RPT channels, and that
is important because the band is small, let alone the
FM portion. I think it is a more efficient use of the
spectrum, but that is just my opinion, for what it is
worth! That aside, a national plan is a good idea. It
is hard to figure out the RPT split in different
regions when you travel. The problem with a national
plan implementation is that not all will want to play
into it for one reason or another, so, things will
pretty much stay the same.

Gabriel, WP3BM

--- "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/13/05, CBoone <CBoone at earthlink.net> wrote:
>  
> > Chris
> > WB5ITT
> > (time for a NATIONAL plan!!)
> 
> Mike wrote
> 
> Agreed,
> 
> I don't care if its the 1MHz split or the 1.7MHz
> split for repeaters
> just come up with a national plan.
> 
> For me its seems more important to have a national
> plan for 50 MHz
> than for 1200 MHz, but duh!
> 
> -- 
> Mike Urich, KA5CVH
> http://ka5cvh.com
> 
> Tradition - The living faith of those now dead.
> Traditionalism - The dead faith of those now living.
> Dr. Alvin Reed
>
______________________________________________________________
> SixClub mailing list
> Home:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sixclub
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:SixClub at mailman.qth.net
> 

Gabriel Sierra
Moondancer Recording Studios
moonrec at prtc.net
http://www.moondancer.freeservers.com