[SFDXA] SuperFox - Interesting Conversation regarding Reception/Propagation
Bill
bmarx at bellsouth.net
Thu Jul 4 09:37:12 EDT 2024
/From WSJTx Improved list:
/Seeing how SuperFox occupies 1.5 kHz bandwidth vs. 50 Hz for a Fox
(normal) stream, how much more vulnerable is the new SuperFox mode to
interference (intentional or otherwise)?
It would be interesting to know what simulations have been done to
investigate the different possible impacts caused by the propagation
itself as well as by man made noise and what the results have been. When
I look at the difficult reception of K8K in Germany in FT8 from time to
time (polar path with a lot of flutter) even with acceptable signal
strenghts I wonder how the signals from Jarvis can be decoded in
Germany. But let us see.
Regarding the 10 dB system gain compared to standard fox: Is there
somebody in the group who can explain or give me some information how
this has been calculated? We can do this off-list because this is
somehow quite specific and not so interesting for the majority of the
users here.
Despite my above comments/questions: I still believe that the new mode
has many advantages when I look at Uwe's list, so this new mode could be
another nice step forward. But we should know the trade offs as well.,73
Juergen, DL8LE
Hello Jürgen,
Firstly, this already results from theoretical considerations. Joe
answered a similar question on the WSJT GROUP forum as follows:
/FT8 transmissions, and each stream of old-style Fox transmissions, each
convey a 77-bit payload. Necessarily, when multiple streams are used
the 1/N^2 law is in effect and signal strength is reduced.//
//
//SuperFox transmissions do not use "streams", and they always convey a
payload of 319 bits. For one QSO at a time FT8 is more efficient, and
uses much less bandwidth. But for many simultaneous QSOs the SuperFox
approach (wider bandwidth, a highly effective Q-ary polar code, 128-FSK
constant envelope modulation) wins by a large margin. /
Then there have been of course a number of comparative tests (mostly
performed by Steve K9AN or Joe). If I remember correctly, the results
showed a system gain of between 9.9 and 12.7 dB
73 de DG2YCB,
Uwe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/sfdxa/attachments/20240704/6abf9dc9/attachment.html>
More information about the SFDXA
mailing list