[SFDXA] K4FK antenna party results

[Kai Siwiak]

Hi Ed,
Nice that the dipoles are ok now. When I get back I can do a NEC 
analysis (I use Arie Voor's 4NEC2 - free, and very nice interface).
Alternatively try a purely analytical mutual coupling analysis, but for 
straight dipoles rather than Vee.

I should be back within a few days, and would like to help with the 
80/160 dipoles.

73
Kai, KE4PT/3



Ed Callaway wrote:
> Pete, N8PR, and I got the 40/30m dipoles re-strung Saturday, using fresh wire and UV-resistant Dacron rope.  The most interesting thing to note of the experience was that the calculated lengths were off by a foot for the two dipoles - too short on 30m, too long on 40m.  Corrections were made, and everything now tunes up where it should.
>
> Pete and I aren't sure why the resonances were so far off, and in opposite directions.  I was expecting some interaction, and a move upward in resonance as the wires were moved from straight dipole to their inverted-vee configuration, but this surprised me.  I had spent a few hours the night before on EZNEC trying to model crossed dipoles, but for a novice at EZNEC it turns out to be hard to simulate that.  Comments welcome.
>
> Regarding 80/160m, the north sides of both dipoles have broken from the center point and are lying on the roof, while the south sides of both dipoles and the feedline are still in their proper place on the tower.  Another antenna party, this one involving actual tower-climbing, will be required to correct the problem.
>
> Ed N4II.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> South Florida DX Assoc. Reflector
>
> SFDXA WebSite: http://qsl.net/k4fk
> SFDXA Repeater 147.33+ 103.5 Tone
> DX Net Wed 7:30 PM Repeater
> EchoLink: K4FK-R
> To Post: mailto:SFDXA at mailman.qth.net
> Info:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sfdxa
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>