[Scan-DC] Virginia STARS NACs

[John Wilson]

No. My STARS sites database mostly shows what is shown below for the 
seven divisions but also included are occasional "19E" and a few 
"293"(May be erroneous original sourced) such as an internet posting for 
Dumfries Scales as "293" which should have been "193" but I could not 
confirm it because of vhf unnecessary same frequency reuse by the techs 
which conflicts for example both the Fork Mtn/Waverly sites use the same 
Primary CC frequencies.  It makes no sense to me for such when there are 
sufficient lower 161 mhz. frequencies unused and available.  I don't buy 
the possible other frequencies conflict relationship argument.  Anyway,  
I tried to use whatever had been obtained from individuals monitoring 
mobile a particular site using Pro96Com captured files in divisions such 
as Div 4 and 6 especially which obviously I could not monitor.

John

David L. Wilson wrote:
>> Can anybody confirm that the NACs used on Virginia’s STARS network is
>> simply the site number with a zero added?
>>
>> For example, Arlington is Site 19, with NAC 190.
>>
>> Is this the case statewide?
> NO
> N195	01-08	Hogback Mtn. (Rappahannock)
> N193	01-03	Mineral (Louisa)
> N19B	01-06	Thornburg (Spotsylania)
> N192	01-04	Warsaw (Richmond)
> N19A	01-05	Rumford (King William)
> N198	01-1B	King George (Edge Hill)
> N190	01-12	Independent Hill (Prince William)
> N195	01-07	Fork Mtn. (Madison)
> N190	02-05	Orange (Orange)
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Scan-DC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html