[Scan-DC] COMING SOON: Mont. Co. EMS chase car pilot
Jeff Krauss
jeff at krauss.ws
Fri Apr 11 10:24:47 EDT 2014
It has always seemed to me to be a waste of
resources to send heavy apparatus on ALS calls.
At 11:46 PM 4/10/2014, Alan Henney wrote:
>-------------------------------------------
>Subject: Paramedic Chase Car - Test Over the
>past year and a half, the Operations Division
>and the EMS section has been evaluating our EMS
>deployment model. One of our main goals is to
>ensure the on-scene arrival of an ALS provider
>within 8 minutes of dispatch of an ALS
>call. We also have to ensure that we are using
>resources in an efficient manner. During our
>study of the ALS component of our EMS system, we
>found that we still have some gaps in ALS
>response times and that we are over utilizing
>ALS transport units for known BLS calls. The
>proposed ALS delivery model for the future is
>that almost all transport units will be BLS, and
>all Engines will be Paramedic Engines. The
>busier stations will also have Paramedic Chase
>Units (PCUâs) to supplement the Paramedic
>Engines. Our PCUâs will be light duty
>vehicles with one or two paramedics, sets of ALS
>gear, SCBA, and PPE that will respond with
>transport units to ALS calls. The intent is to
>get a cot and the right number of paramedics and
>providers to our EMS calls with the minimum
>number of apparatus. Accordingly, we will be
>placing ALS703, ALS708, ALS725, and ALS742 in
>service on or about April 20th to test the
>Paramedic Chase Unit concept. The PCU Test will
>run for about three months and will allow us to
>collect data to validate and/or fine tune the
>ALS delivery model for the future. ALS703 and
>ALS725 will be staffed with a single ALS
>provider. ALS708 will have two ALS providers.
>ALS742 will be staffed with two during the day
>and at least one at night. During the test, the
>existing Medic units at 3, 8, 25, R2 will be
>restaffed as Ambulances; therefore there will be
>no change in the numbers of transport units
>available from those stations. During the
>test, we will be evaluating: ALS response times,
>The decline of heavy apparatus calls, ALS
>readiness and reliability, The rate of ALS
>triage and downgrades, and The provider and
>patient satisfaction. In the development and
>planning of this test, we have meet with the two
>representative organizations, required support
>sections (ECC/Fleet/etc), and started
>coordination with the station commanders and
>LFRD leadership at the test stations. These
>coordination efforts have lead to valuable input
>and delayed this organization wide announcement.
>Plans are in place to provide station/shift
>level roll-out next week. Additional information
>will be forthcoming. I ask that you remain as
>flexible as possible and as supportive as you
>can be. I understand how difficult change can
>be, but as public safety leaders and providers,
>we need to objectively measure whether this
>method of delivery is better for the residents
>we
>serve.
>______________________________________________________________
>Scan-DC mailing list Home:
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post:
>mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net This list hosted
>by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this
>email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Scan-DC
mailing list