[Scan-DC] Security Cameras

Sun May 5 21:38:01 EDT 2013

Hmmm... you're beginning to win me over, ol' buddy!  :)

One good point is that this gear is inexpensive enough that putting it in isn't a big financial drain, and it obviously helped you get the goods on the FXW.  Hopefully the same thing will happen with the break-in "suspects" (bullshit.)  Nothing to lose, obviously...

Buddy of mine recently got in a big hassle over a road rage incident and bought himself a dash cam... I hate to think that we have to do that, but...

I'd love to get the goods on Montcamera County's finests as they blast up and down the ICC at 80 mph... one got on eastbound in front of me this afternoon - I came off the on-ramp doing 70 and that sucker was already out of site.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brooks, Kurt" <knbrooks at wusa9.com>
> To: Doug Kitchener <oldsdoug at yahoo.com>
> Cc: SCANDC <Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2013 7:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] Security Cameras
> 
> Sorry I have not had a chance to write back in detail.  I just spent the day 
> fixing the door on a friend's house that was broken into and installing more 
> cameras and lights. 
> 
> I also spoke to an Annapolis police officer for a half hour and showed him the 
> footage of the break in. He is very excited to see the two Hispanic males in the 
> 4 door sedan at 9;05pm May 3 break into the house. 
> 
> Also, though I have not spoken a word about it here, my Ford F350 was stolen 
> April 16 from in front if my house. Because I had security cameras and remote 
> access, the moment I was told my yruck was missing by a friend I accessed the 
> DVR, saw it is my future Mrs Ex Wife, watched her steal a bunch of crap from the 
> yard and leave. Because I knew who I was dealing with I was able to grab the 
> truck back 4 hours later, and with my evidence my divorce lawyer is currently 
> making her life hell. 
> 
> So yeah, I'm a fan. 
> 
> Right now I have to edit my evidence for the police, and try to figure out what 
> to do with the 40 minutes of video of a drunk driver from Wednesday.
> 
> No the police never caught her. Jurisdiction issues. Alan heard the cops talking 
> about me on the scanner. Hell of a story but we have to be careful since the 
> 'suspect' was never caught. 
> 
> I'll let everyone know if & when that story airs. All dashcam, baby! $60 
> from eBay. 
> 
> That's another rant - buy a dashcam and protect yourselves! I beat 3 
> insurance cases since December with my Dash Cameras. And I got the East Coast 
> meteor a couple months ago. 
> 
> More later. 
> 
> Kurt 
> 
> On May 4, 2013, at 20:06, "Doug Kitchener" <oldsdoug at yahoo.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>>  The only trouble is that visual surveillance such as this doesn't 
> prevent these events... not that it's meant to, but I still wonder how much 
> of a deterrent it is.  And although it could help to identify the 
> "suspects", as we have to call the bludgers because of their 
> "rights", I honestly don't have a lot of faith in my local 
> serveprotects to apprehend these types, let alone prosecute and punish them (and 
> / or get my property back).  There was an example here recently in Montcamera 
> County, of all places - I forget exactly where... but the homeowner got perfect 
> video of the bludgers getting into one of his vehicles, finding the keys to the 
> other one (duuh), and driving off with it.  The end.  I'm not sure I wanna 
> watch!
>> 
>>  In fact - reading this over, I'm reminded of an incident back in 
> November... I have some stuff in a Public Storage near here.  Gated, cameras 
> everywhere (lighting may be a different story; they're so cheap about 
> electricity, and I'm not sure whether good lighting is a hindrance / 
> deterrent anyway or whether it just helps the bludgers to see what they're 
> doing.)  At any rate, back in November, several units, 6 I think, including 
> mine, were broken into (locks cut) and some items taken... and yet not only is 
> the whole thing a big mystery; but Montcamera County's Finest basically 
> didn't care and did mudnya about it.  By mystery I mean that no one seems to 
> have the faintest idea of how these people even got in or out, or how they 
> managed to move several bulky items (air compressors, chop saws) out of the 
> place.  The Finest apparently have the video, but they didn't even try to 
> lift prints from the doors of any of the units.  Apparently what they do is
>>  write reports.  Oh well.
>> 
>>  Note, I'm not trying to argue or disssuade anyone from beefing up any 
> sort of security or surveillance - just sort of chipping in with my skepticism 
> and cynicism!  :)
>> 
>>  Regards,
>> 
>>  Doug
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>  From: "Brooks, Kurt" <knbrooks at wusa9.com>
>>>  To: SCANDC <Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net>
>>>  Cc: 
>>>  Sent: Saturday, May 4, 2013 1:42 PM
>>>  Subject: [Scan-DC] Security Cameras
>>> 
>>>  As many are aware I am a big fan of cameras - dash cams, security cams, 
> etc.
>>> 
>>>  Here's what my home security camera picked up last night:
>>> 
>>>  http://youtu.be/1rRdT3NkXKU
>>> 
>>>  The text of the upload says:
>>> 
>>>  At 3:55am the morning of May 4, 2013 two people were videotaped by my 
> home 
>>>  security system entering a vehicle parked on 6th Street in Annapolis, 
> MD. 
>>>  Several cameras catch a good view of the two suspects as they approach 
> however 
>>>  the camera that sees them in the vehicle is very dark. That shot, from 
> :28 sec 
>>>  to 1:42 shows them entering the shot from the right, walking up to the 
> vehicle 
>>>  and opening the driver's door. You can see a light go on inside the 
> 
>>>  passenger compartment and the suspect can be seen searching the inside 
> of the 
>>>  vehicle for a total of 1 minute. Then in the shot after that the same 
> suspect 
>>>  can be seen checking the door of the next car before moving Northwest 
> on 6th 
>>>  Street. During the time the first suspect was searching the vehicle the 
> second 
>>>  was lost from view and was not seen again.
>>> 
>>>  This video was captured by an inexpensive home security system. I 
> heartily 
>>>  suggest all homeowners consider investing in such equipment to help 
> fight 
>>>  criminals, petty or otherwise.
>>> 
>>>  There is no audio.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  To be clear I do not believe this is news. I do think this is another 
> good 
>>>  example as to why everyone should consider such protection. That system 
> that 
>>>  caught his evidence cost me $350, and I haven't finished mounting 
> the other 
>>>  4 cameras.
>>> 
>>>  Thanks
>>> 
>>>  Kurt
>>> 
>>>  ______________________________________________________________
>>>  Scan-DC mailing list
>>>  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>>  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>  Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>> 
>>>  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>  ______________________________________________________________
>>  Scan-DC mailing list
>>  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>>  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>  Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>> 
>>  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 