[Scan-DC] DC Overtuned Vehicle Dispatch

Clegg, Andrew W. aclegg at nsf.gov
Wed Dec 7 13:54:07 EST 2011


But then didn't that incident involve multiple fatalities?

-----Original Message-----
From: scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David Jones
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:32 PM
To: scan-dc at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] DC Overtuned Vehicle Dispatch

Yesterday FFX ran a box at 10555 Main St. in Fairfax for "large amount
of 
smoke coming from the rear of the building."

"Engine 402 to Fairfax, put all units in service."  "I spoke with the
owner 
at the Everly Funeral Home;  it was smoke from the crematorium."  "He
said 
they just had a large production."

David Jones

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Editor, ARLnow.com" <arlingtonnews at gmail.com>
To: "George Haymond" <ghaymond at gmail.com>
Cc: <scan-dc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] DC Overtuned Vehicle Dispatch


> My personal favorite was the "shooting" call in Arlington a couple of
> months back. A good 3/4ths of active units probably rushed to the
scene.
> Turns out it was a couple of kids messing around with BB guns.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:32 AM, George Haymond <ghaymond at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> Believe alot of it depends on the accuracy the initial caller
provides to
>> 911, and how in their panic may exaggerate the scene to bring about a
>> 'better' response.  Last night I heard a call for accident w/injury
on a
>> street near Fair Oaks hospital. The responding engine stated it was a
>> struck pedestrian, in the hospital ER parking lot.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Clegg, Andrew W. <aclegg at nsf.gov>
wrote:
>>
>> > Hey Kurt --
>> >
>> > No dig at you intended! I often hear the same kind of thing in 
>> > Arlington
>> > County. Honestly, it sometimes leaves me scratching my head as to
how
>> > the actual scenario could be confused with the phoned-in/dispatched
>> > scenario. I exaggerated below, but I've sometimes heard calls that
>> > approach this level of disparity.
>> >
>> > Andy
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Brooks, Kurt [mailto:knbrooks at wusa9.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:20 AM
>> > To: Clegg, Andrew W.; 'scan-dc at mailman.qth.net'
>> > Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] DC Overtuned Vehicle Dispatch
>> >
>> > I agree. That's why I try to emphasize initial dispatch vrs 1st
unit
>> > sizeup when reporting.
>> >
>> > I'm just a bit bored at the moment.
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Clegg, Andrew W. [mailto:aclegg at nsf.gov]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:15 AM
>> > To: Brooks, Kurt; scan-dc at mailman.qth.net <scan-dc at mailman.qth.net>
>> > Subject: RE: [Scan-DC] DC Overtuned Vehicle Dispatch
>> >
>> > I'm often amused at the difference between the 911 call/dispatch 
>> > report,
>> > and what they actually find on scene:
>> >
>> > Dispatch: "Respond to an overturned truck that's burst into flames
and
>> > is leaking acid, with possibly four people entrapped and one
ejected"
>> >
>> > On-scene report: "A GMC Pacer with a flat tire. Place all units in
>> > service."
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>> > [mailto:scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Brooks, Kurt
>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:06 AM
>> > To: 'scan-dc at mailman.qth.net'
>> > Subject: Re: [Scan-DC] DC Overtuned Vehicle Dispatch
>> >
>> > One vehicle upright no entrapment holding w/ engine & bls
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Brooks, Kurt
>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 09:58 AM
>> > To: 'scan-dc at mailman.qth.net' <scan-dc at mailman.qth.net>
>> > Subject: DC Overtuned Vehicle Dispatch
>> >
>> > I295 sb @ laboratory rd 1st call ops B3
>> > ______________________________________________________________
>> > Scan-DC mailing list
>> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> > Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>> >
>> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> > ______________________________________________________________
>> > Scan-DC mailing list
>> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> > Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>> >
>> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> >
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Scan-DC mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Scan-DC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1415 / Virus Database: 2102/4065 - Release Date:
12/07/11
> 

______________________________________________________________
Scan-DC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


More information about the Scan-DC mailing list