[Scan-DC] local criminal using scanners

[Charley Armstrong]

Perhaps using logical concept "channel" instead of frequency or TalkGroup gets around the problem.

Changing the subject a bit, a WaPo reporter did a feature recently about a young flyer at Potomac Airfield in southern PG.  She quoted him addressing "Potomac Tower" when making a radio call about his intention to taxi from the ramp to the active runway.  The problem is that Potomac Airfield has no control tower.  What he probably said was "Potomac Traffic" on the CTAF.  Reporters really do need to be more accurate.

CA

On Nov 23, 2009, at 8:05 AM, Andrew Feinberg wrote:

> Hi. Reporter here (but not the one in question). 
> 
> While clip vs magazine is the stuff of many a copy desk shouting match, I have never seen the term "automatic revolver" used. 
> 
> OTOH, it is not totally incorrect to say scanners were on a particular freq and omit a line about a TG -- which can easily become 1-2 paragraphs on what trunking is.  While it is a faux pas to persons like us, "frequency" it is much easier for  readers to understand using in fewer words. It is not a matter of being "sexy," it is one of being understood by your readership. 
> 
> Even you knew what the reporter meant, at least enough to make fun of him.   
> ------Original Message------
> From: Glenn Morris
> Sender: scan-dc-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> To: scan-dc at mailman.qth.net
> ReplyTo: Glenn Morris
> Subject: [Scan-DC]  local criminal using scanners
> Sent: Nov 22, 2009 2:24 PM
> 
> True. But do you expect better from reporters?  What reporters screw-up 
> could fill a library of books. Firearms magazines are called "clips", 
> revolvers are automatic revolvers and the list goes on. Besides,  it 
> sensationalizes the story.  Saying "tuned to the Fairfax County Freq" sounds 
> so much more threatening than "listening to the main police talk group."
> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:24:00 -0500
>> From: Jeff Krauss <jeff at krauss.ws>
>> Subject: [Scan-DC] local criminal using scanners
>> To: scan-dc at mailman.qth.net,scan-dc at mailman.qth.net
>> Message-ID: <0KTF00DZ8ZWDO360 at vms173009.mailsrvcs.net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>> 
>> There is no such thing as "the Fairfax County frequency".  FFX uses a
>> trunked system shared by all of its public safety agencies that uses
>> many frequencies. 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Scan-DC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 
> 
> --
> Andrew G. Feinberg
> andrew at ultraviolet.org
> 215.906.1886
> ______________________________________________________________
> Scan-DC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html