[Scan-DC] Blocking EMS scanner traffic hurts the public
Andrew Clegg
w4jecom at w4je.com
Sun Aug 2 09:46:51 EDT 2009
I think the writing's on the wall. Given enough time, it will likely become
impossible to listen in on most public safety communications, at least in
major cities. I think no matter how much we wish there was some
"right-to-know" argument, public safety communications will be encrypted or
transmitted in a format that can't be scanned by the public. I really hope
this doesn't happen, but if it does, I for one could understand the
justification -- privacy of medical patients, the need to keep criminals
from knowing the details of police activity, etc. Has there ever been a
successful challenge to a particular public safety agency going
encrypted/proprietary based on the needs of scanner listeners or newspaper
reporters?
The "right-to-know" argument is especially weak in my opinion. Public safety
activity is almost always pre-decisional -- cops are sometimes chasing
"criminals" who turn out not to be criminals, or even if they are, they have
not had their day in court, so perhaps their information (including SSN,
name, address, and descriptors, in the case of VSP) and claimed violations
should not be transmitted for anyone to hear, especially in a high-pressure
environment where, unlike court, what is said about suspected criminals may
be heat-of-the-moment.
Newspapers want to be able to listen to public safety communications because
they profit (or try to profit) from writing articles about the incidents
they hear. It's not, I believe, because there's some public good that comes
out of "the right" to listen to our public safety officials at work.
The argument that we should be able to listen in for our own safety (if we
hear criminal activity in our own neighborhood) is also weak, in my opinion.
If it's on the scanner, then the cops (or fire or EMS) already know it, and
they are there to protect us (I know, I know...we can argue all day about
how effective they are, but the point is, it is their job). I can't recall a
single incident in many years of scanner listening where I had to take some
quick action to protect my safety based on what I was hearing on the
scanner. I have used it to avoid traffic back-ups, for example, but that's
more of a convenience thing, not a safety issue.
Please don't take my ramblings as a wish to make public safety
communications un-scannable, but after a few decades of listening to police,
fire, and EMS on scanners, I'm (slowly) preparing to find other things on
the scanner to listen to that are likely to take longer (if ever) to be
encrypted/proprietary, such as aeronautical and ham. I think listenable
public-safety communications will eventually go the way of Kodachrome.
Cheers,
Andy
More information about the Scan-DC
mailing list