[Scan-DC] Major Crash I-95 NB at Franconia Rd
scan-dc at djbitz.com
scan-dc at djbitz.com
Sun Mar 20 09:15:04 EST 2005
As I remember those are M.C.I. tags. I think is not considered the STANDARD
to use them in incidents over I think 30. But my memory is going back 6
years.
JOHN
-----Original Message-----
From: Jackie McElroy [mailto:jackie at mcjackie.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 10:02 PM
To: Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Scan-DC] Major Crash I-95 NB at Franconia Rd
At 09:14 PM on 3/19/2005,
Doug K. <oldsdoug at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Red tags? Hadn't heard that one - is that the same as
> Priority One; i.e. "life-threatening injuries"?
> Or is it Priority Four, which I understand means "requires
> no care"... ie, DOA... beyond care, in other words...
>
Don't know about this jurisdiction, but back in the day when I did such
things, Red Tagging someone at a mass casualty incident indicated highest
priority while black tag was DOA.
-jackie
Jackie McElroy
Washington, D.C.
AIM: mcjackietron
http://www.mcjackie.com
_______________________________________________
Scan-DC mailing list
Scan-DC at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc
More information about the Scan-DC
mailing list