[Scan-DC] PRO96 milair sensitivity

Fri, 30 Apr 2004 21:57:38 -0400

Yep. That's why included this link in my original post.

http://www.starrsoft.com/software/win96/FreqTest.asp

It's Don's sensitivity test results for different "extended frequency"
bands.

Notice how the Pro-96 is significantly more sensitive than the
aforementioned Pro-93/95.

I've never even held a 296 so I can't offer any comparison. However, I have
been able to monitor some Mil-air. I don't know if I'm missing anything. But
I listen to that only occasionally. Thanks for all the freqs you've provided
me in this group.

73s
John 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Mike Agner
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 7:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Scan-DC] PRO96 milair sensitivity

   Last nite, John W3JMV wrote:
===========
So does the Pro-96
============
  Up to a point, that's true; however, one must keep in mind that the RF
section(s) (however they're defined in the DSP code) are not tuned for this
band; so your sensitivity might be terrific, I would buy one, and there's a
better than even chance that mine might be much worse.  There's no QC or
guarantee; the 296 has this band defined, so it's likely to be much more
stable in this regard.

   73s  Mike 

_______________________________________________
Scan-DC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/scan-dc