[SADXA] VE6WZ is incredibly lucky that his crankup tower accident last week wasn't fatal

Tue Sep 3 17:12:16 EDT 2024

 Darrel and all:I looked at the tower and antenna involved in this accident and what sounded to me was, beside what mods he had done on the tower the tower was grossly overloaded . He mentioned he had about 500 lbs of antennas on the  tower. I looked at the specs for  the tower and the engineering on that tower was done for a max load of 200 lbs. That includes the rotor, mast, and antennas. Wires hanging from the tower with tension ads even more. It sure looks like that was going to happen it just needed the last few bits to trigger it.
W6XI

topband at contesting.a
    On Tuesday, September 3, 2024 at 06:42:42 AM MST, Darrel <demerson2718 at gmail.com> wrote:  

 I copied the following from the CWOps group, where it had been posted 
from the topband at contesting.com group.

Ouch.

Cheers
     Darrel  aa7fv

> 3a. *VE6WZ is incredibly lucky that his crankup tower accident last 
> week wasn't fatal*
> From: donovanf at starpower.net 
> <mailto:donovanf at starpower.net?subject=Re:%20VE6WZ%20is%20incredibly%20lucky%20that%20his%20crankup%20tower%20accident%20last%20week%20wasn%27t%20fatal>
> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 08:28:01 MST
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "VE6WZ Steve" <ve6wz at shaw.ca>
> To: "topband" <topband at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 2, 2024 7:55:08 AM
> Subject: Topband: Tower failure at VE6WZ
>
> Hello fellow DXers......
>
> VE6WZ will be QRT from the HF bands above 160m.
>
> On Tuesday Aug 27, I suffered a main lift cable failure on my crank up 
> tower that destroyed all of my Yagi's and the US tower.
> At the time of the failure, I was beside the tower (doing work) in my 
> man lift while the tower was going up.
> The tower was almost at full height (at 100') when the main lift cable 
> broke.
> About 500 pounds of Yagis came crashing down almost instantly from 
> 100'. I was in the manlift, and my reaction was to "go down" into the 
> man basket when I heard the crash. This is what saved me. The man 
> basket cage was somewhat damaged and bent.
> I am totally ok, with not a scratch, but the cage of the man basket 
> protected me.
> There was debris, bolts, brackets, tubing, pieces of the booms flying 
> everywhere, but somehow, the man lift was not knocked down. After the 
> collapse, one of the 80m Yagi elements was laying on the man basket, 
> but I was able to push it off, and lower the man lift to get out.
> The tower, my 80m-40m Yagis are completely destroyed. Unrepairable. 
> The high band Optibeam is probably repairable. 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WPDpMbGaS1r8qgjWlj4AFyS8Gog5uSnY/view?usp=sharing 
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WPDpMbGaS1r8qgjWlj4AFyS8Gog5uSnY/view?usp=sharing>
>
> Why did this happen?
> It was my mistake.
> I am building a 4 element, 160m, 6 direction triangular parasitic 
> array and needed to modify the shunt feed for the US tower crankup. 
> The crankup is the driver for the parasitic elements.
> The existing shunt feed for the tower needed to me modified into a 
> symmetrical skirt surrounding the tower to maintain balanced coupling 
> to the parasitics.
> I clamped brackets to the outside of each section to support the 
> shunt-wire standoffs.
> These clamps were working well for the last 3 months, but after a high 
> wind, some of the shunt wires moved and caused the support arms to 
> bend inward.
> This bending shifted one (or more) of the brackets to bend INWARD into 
> the inner moving sections, then toward the main lift cable and 
> basically sliced the main lift cable.
> The point is, this failure was not something that would have happened 
> normally, but was only because of my poor engineering/ modifications. 
> I guess that’s why they are called accidents?
>
> I have owned the US tower crankup for 26 years, (beginning at my city 
> QTH) and have been fastidious about maintenance of the cables, sheaves 
> and motorized raising fixture, and have had trouble free use of it.
> I will miss it.
> My homebrew 80m-40m 2 el Yagis have been in service for 22 years and I 
> have had great enjoyment using them.
> On 40m I have worked DXCC Honour roll with 336 confirmed, and have 293 
> DXCC confirmed on 80m.
> I really wanted to make it to 300 DXCC on 80m, but maybe that will 
> encourage me to build an 80m vertical array?
>
> I have decided not to replace the tower. I want to simplify my remote 
> station, and looking back over the last few years, I have been almost 
> exclusively active on 160m anyway.
> It has been pretty rare to hear ve6wz above 40m, let alone on 80m for 
> the last few years.
> I plan to remove (and sell for scrap) the 2,000 lb US tower, and 
> replace it with another 90' irrigation tubing vertical to complete my 
> 4 element triangular 160m TX array.
>
> Here is a some detail about the 160m array:
>
> The driver "was" the shunt fed tower, but that (next year) will be 
> replaced with a 90' irrigation tubing vertical.
> There are 3 parasitic elements surrounding the driver (75' toploaded 
> irrigation verts) spaced at 60'.
> At any time, 3 elements are active, one parasitic tuned as a director, 
> the other as a reflector.
> The array is a variant of the classic K3LR, K9CT, VE3EJ 3 element 
> inline array, but in my case, the 3 elements are spatially "offset".
> For example, the north parasitic tuned as a director pushes forward 
> gain north, but the SW parasitic pushes the pattern NE.
> The really crazy thing, is that modelling shows the forward gain and 
> F/B to be down only .4 dB from the inline design, PLUS, I get 6 
> directions!
> To my knowledge no one has ever built an array like this.
>
> Before the tower collapse, I actually had completed the array and was 
> just finalizing the expanded radial system for the north element. 
> (another 8,000' of copper wire)
> I had done some field testing with my signal source and RX testing in 
> the field while TXing. The field test where identical to my model.
> The array shows 3.5-4dB forward gain (compared to a single vertical) 
> and about 20 dB F/B.
> My plan was to make a YouTube video (and a .pdf paper) describing the 
> array, modelling, installation and field testing, but that will now be 
> delayed until next year.
>
> Since the tower failure, I have already modified the north parasitic, 
> so it is now tuned and fed as a driver, and using the SW and SE 
> parasitics as refelctors I at least have gain to EU and JA.
> So VE6WZ I will still be QRV on 160m this winter season.
> My 9 band RBN CW skimmer is offline until I reinstall a new antenna 
> since that skimmer antenna was on the tower.
> Both of my 160m RBN skimmers are still running.
>
> That’s a long story, but I wanted to share this with the topband 
> community since the VE6WZ remote station will be taking a slightly 
> different direction.
>
> Steve, Ve6wz.
> ___
______________________________________________________________
SADXA Website http://www.sadxa.org

SADXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sadxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:SADXA at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
You can support qsl.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html  