[SADXA] Output Impedance of Baluns

[Wes]

Your methodology seems reasonable.  But think about this.  In the transmit case 
the impedance transformation of the actual antenna feedpoint impedance to the 
input of the balun is probably immaterial as far as delivering rated power.  If 
you want to worry that the fed element isn't driven by 50 ohm, hence the antenna 
isn't delivering advertised gain, FB or whatever, then absent any effects from 
the balun you must still worry that the TX output impedance is 50 ohm, something 
that is almost never the case.

IMHO, in a Yagi, the gain, FB, etc are all dependent upon the *relative* 
currents and phases between elements and the DE, so whether it's precisely 
resonant or not seems to me to be largely irrelevant.

Regards,

Wes


On 12/22/2018 7:41 PM, W7EXG (Bill) wrote:
> Hi Wes,
>
> I actually ordered 3 Baluns from Balun Design.
>
> WHAT WAS TESTED
>
> 1) 1/1 (for whatever) model 1115
> 2) 1.5/1 (for 75/50) ohm model 15113
> 3) 1/2 (for 25/50) ohm model 1213
>
> OUTPUT IMPEDANCE TEST SET UP
>
> 1/1- I use a Resistive Dummy load at the input (both for 75 ohm and 50 ohm
> input tests).
>
> 1.5/1 and 1/2 - I used a 50 ohm resistive dummy load at the input.
>
> I terminated the output to close external stud terminals with a BNC
> connector coupled closely between the outputs.
>
> OUTPUT IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT
>
> I used a RIG EXPERT AA-54 to measure both the [R + JX] and [R // JX]
> equivalent models.
>
> Frequency sweep range was from 3 MHz to 54 MHz.
>
> Basically I was treating the balun as a black box by studying the input
> impedance with appropriate output resistive termination, and the output
> impedance with the appropriate input resistive terminations. From Classic
> two port network analysis.
>
> I independently verified the resistive loads over the anticipated frequency
> test range.
>
> RESULTS
>
> All 3 baluns had different output impedance. Although the real part was
> anticipated somewhat within an expected range, the imaginary part was
> substantially different, from capacitive (-JX) to inductive (+JX) reactance.
>
>
> As mentioned in my original comments, the 1/1 balun was inductive and the
> 75/50 ohm balun was capacitive. So what is substantial?
>
> On a 10m fixed element rotatable dipole at 40 feet, the resonant frequency
> of the 1/1 balun with 75 ohm coax was (JX=0)28400 kHz, while the same
> antenna/height using the 75/50 ohm balun with 50 ohm input coax had a
> resonant frequency (JX=0) of 29600 kHz, or 4.2% resonant frequency shift.
>
> Although the percent change was small, for me, the over 1 MHz shift in
> resonant frequency made me a very unhappy camper.
>
> This is what led me to characterize the output impedance of all the baluns I
> had ordered. I suspected at that time, the reactance of each balun was not
> the same.
>
> IMPLICATION:
>
> When someone has a fixed element antenna and replaces the original balun
> with another, it is possible the resonant frequency of the antenna will
> shift, if the output impedances of each balun were not the same.
>
> Worst case -- is when one buys a balanced fixed element antenna without a
> balun, and purchases a balun without the manufactures recommendation. The
> resonant frequency of the fixed element antenna will be a function of the
> balun purchased, not the element length (AS IT SAYS IN THE ARRL ANTENNA
> BOOK!!) Hi Hi
> (Of course one could compensate by tweaking the element lengths, but on a 5
> element Yagi, perhaps one should just employ the correct balun replacement).
>
>
> SUGGESTED MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATION
>
> This is the reason I suggest that ALL balun manufactures should specify the
> output impedance for any design ratio, and specify the input conditions
> under which this impedance was measured. This is the ONLY way one would know
> what balun to choose for their application. This would insure no resonant
> frequency change will occur with the NEW balun attached to their OLD fixed
> element antenna.
>
> I hope this answers your question?
>
> Best 73's
> Bill W7EXG
>