[SADXA] CY9C 60m CW at 02:30Z

[Jim Henderson]

         Yes, worked on about 3 calls. Would be better if they split.

         One has to look at the FCC/NTIA channel plan. Usually it is 
quoted as the center of a 2.8 KHz wide allocation.

         5373 for CW but 5371.5 for USB. There is a good explanation at 
ARRL.ORG, among other places.


KF7E


On 8/24/2016 3:06 AM, Tom Kramer wrote:
> Jim,
>  I take it that you worked them?  I too but took several repeats to 
> copy them through the late callers.  I didn't copy them strong but as 
> they say... just strong enough.  I didn't think 5373 was a CW channel 
> but maybe my frequency reference is bad.  Again as they say ..  WFWLater.
>
> 73 Tom
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Jim KF7E
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 7:36 PM
> To: cadxa_share1 at yahoogroups.com ; Southern AZ DX Association E-Mail 
> Reflector
> Subject: [SADXA] CY9C 60m CW at 02:30Z
>
> Amazing, with the K index =5, but loudest heard yet on 60m.
>
> Heard K7NN make it also.
>
> KF7E
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SADXA Website http://www.sadxa.org
>
> SADXA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sadxa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SADXA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> You can support qsl.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> SADXA Website http://www.sadxa.org
>
> SADXA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sadxa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SADXA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> You can support qsl.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>