[SADXA] V73D 160 meters
RSoifer1 at aol.com
RSoifer1 at aol.com
Sun Oct 25 09:43:38 EDT 2015
In a message dated 10/25/2015 6:05:12 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
wes at triconet.org writes:
I spent three days chasing them on 160 and finally connected this morning
(Sunday) at 1204Z. There was huge QSB and was very frustrating to hear
them on
a peak answering guys over and over with no response. But they were up
against
local noise.
>From their website: "The big Marshall Island Resort allowed us to install
all 9
antennas from 160 to 6 m. The 80- and 160 m Verticals are 50 m away on a
platform direct at the lagoon. All antennas have a good SWR but the
problem is a
high man made noise from the hotel area. May be from hundreds of air
conditions,
pump stations, beach lights and other things. That means we are hearing
not good
and are not happy about so many signals just in the noise. That means your
signal must be over this noise. The noise level from 160 to 30 m is never
better
than S5 noise, on 80 m extremely bad with constant S8. Any receiving
antennas
sets could not improve the receiving situation – always the same noise.
Anyway,
we continue operating the low bands and try our best to get you all in our
log!"
My antenna BTW is an inverted V, up only 45' at the apex with the ends
tied off
to Palo Verde trees about 4' above ground. I suspect some vertical
radiation
from the coax as the common mode choke impedance is negligible at 160.
Using my
"old" K3 and KPA500. There were a few more static crashes than two days
ago
when my noise was unbelievably low for 160. Never heard it so quiet.
______________________________________________________________
SADXA Website http://www.sadxa.org
SADXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sadxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:SADXA at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
You can support qsl.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the SADXA
mailing list