[SADXA] ZL8X 28022.2

[Jim Henderson]

   Yes, I agree.



   I even worked them on 4 bands mobile, and have even considered (sort of) 
digging out my old KAM for RTTY, maybe actually soldering up a new interface 
cable...

   Maybe they will show on 160 SSB tomorrow!

   Mucho suerte bien, desperados.

KF7E







----- Original Message ----- 
From: "W6XI" <jdwothe at cox.net>
To: "Southern AZ DX Association E-Mail Reflector" <sadxa at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: [SADXA] ZL8X 28022.2


>I worked them with 100w on a dipole for the WARC bands. Its getting pretty
> desperate. And even more desperate I worked them on 18 megs on RTTY.
>
> W6XI
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Wes Stewart" <n7ws at yahoo.com>
> To: "Southern AZ DX Association E-Mail Reflector" <sadxa at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 2:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [SADXA] ZL8X 28022.2
>
>
> Not a peep here on my now 160-m dipole. But worked them on 24892.3 up 
> 2115Z.
> Begging.
>
> --- On Wed, 11/24/10, W6XI <jdwothe at cox.net> wrote:
>
> From: W6XI <jdwothe at cox.net>
> Subject: [SADXA] ZL8X 28022.2
> To: "SADXA Reflector" <sadxa at mailman.qth.net>, "CADXA" <dxtalk at cadxa.org>
> Date: Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 1:30 PM
>
> Big signal
>
> UP 3
>
> W6XI
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SADXA Website http://www.sadxa.org
>
> SADXA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sadxa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SADXA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> You can support qsl.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> SADXA Website http://www.sadxa.org
>
> SADXA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/sadxa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:SADXA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> You can support qsl.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.