[RVRC] ARRL Comments on RM-11699 - a petition regarding encrypted messages during an emergency

[pisymbol .]

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:54 PM, drew Moore <drumor at optonline.net> wrote:

>
> Subject: ARRL Comments on RM-11699 - a petition regarding encypted
> messages during an emergency
>
> Recently, a Petition for Rule Making (RM-11699) was made to the FCC by
> Don Rolph, AB1PH, in which he proposed to allow encryption of a
> transmitted signal during an emergency.  He argued that in his belief,
> the open, in-the-clear transmission of health information, is a
> violation of HIPAA rules (Health Insurance Portability and
> Accountability Act of 1996), and such violation will keep Amateur Radio
> from participating during relief efforts.
>
> His understanding of HIPAA rules is erroneous as HIPAA rules do not
> apply to Amateur Radio.  There has also been no known evidence of
> served agencies not allowing Amateur Radio support due to privacy
> issues.
>
> While the ARRL does not normally comment on petitions for rule making,
> the Executive Board felt it necessary to do so in this case.  The
> League has just issued comments in opposition to Mr. Rolph’s request.
> I am in complete agreement with the ARRL’s position in this matter.
>
> The League’s comments may be found on the Hudson Division website,
> www.hudson.arrl.org  Click on Division Announcements
>
>

Interestingly enough, this issue has been bounced around before:

http://www.arrl.org/news/american-red-cross-clarifies-amateur-radio-policy

That was back in 2008.

Why doesn't the ARRL petition the FCC to just amend the rules to allow for
encrypted traffic under 97 if required?

If H&W messages can be passed encrypted, why is that so terrible? In fact,
wouldn't every institution if given a choice rather have this communication
encrypted?

-aps