[RVRC] Internet failure at the Lund residence

[Alexander Sack]

On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Paul Nannery <kc2vrj at gmail.com> wrote:

> its not our account its sues account her request to us staying on site has
> been we follow all rules and laws including the tos its in her name so we
> have to follow her wishes also they can termanate services for  for
> volations this means she would lose both her phone and tv as well as
> internet as the main email said this was to inform the  club not try and
> make a choice.
>
Is she looking for guidance from the technical committee regarding the
Internet connection at home or has she made her decision?

Scott's email seemed to indicate the later not the former since it included
explanations about why she needed to do this:

"The tech committee & her have both spoken to Verizon about
what we do with the service at her property. Residential FiOS service has
port blocking in place that would make the use of Asterisk impossible, along
with dynamic security measures that are designed to block VoIP traffic."

Now Paul, you are telling me it has to do with TOS not anything to do with
technical limitations of a residential service (c'mon we both know Verizon
is going to wave the party line to sell Susan the business account).

Speaking of TOS, she had Cablevision:

http://www.optimum.net/Terms

Read 22. That means all these years we were in violation of the TOS.

By the way, was this brought up at the meeting last Wednesday to vote on?
If I am rehashing stuff that was already articulated to the membership body
and voted on, I completely apologize for all the noise, I didn't know that
since the email didn't state that.

-aps