[R-390] Tuning SSB

Ing. Giovanni Becattini giovanni.becattini at icloud.com
Sun Sep 29 16:50:39 EDT 2024


Hi,
I don’t answer …because I “know", but just because I find the theme intriguing and have similar doubts. This is a picture from the 51J-4 manual, which I think should be good also for the R-390A:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot 2024-09-29 alle 22.11.58.png
Type: image/png
Size: 652612 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/r-390/attachments/20240929/2a6e9afd/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------

Because we must rebuild something similar to an AM signal but with just one side band, I believe we must keep the BFO 1.5 kHz above the center frequency of the filter for LSB and below for USB. And, obviously, we need to “move” the received signal (upper or lower band) to stay centered on the filter using the VFO.

In other words: tune the VFO so that the band (upper or lower) is centered on the filter, and move the BFO +1.5 kHz above if the band we want to read is the lower, and vice versa.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: What is SSB: Single Sideband Modulation ? Electronics Notes.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4438 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/r-390/attachments/20240929/2a6e9afd/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------


This interpretation seems to be confirmed by the manual itself:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot 2024-09-29 alle 22.21.53.png
Type: image/png
Size: 601352 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/r-390/attachments/20240929/2a6e9afd/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------


And this should be true also for SSB. In addition, it lets me think that with the 6 kHz filter, the dial reading does correspond to the carrier frequency of station.

All that assumes that the filter is centered on the IF channel, even if not specified by the 51J-4 manual (left), but specified by the R-390A manual (right)) and however rather obvious
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Immagineallegata-1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 298244 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/r-390/attachments/20240929/2a6e9afd/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Immagineallegata-2.png
Type: image/png
Size: 118415 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/r-390/attachments/20240929/2a6e9afd/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------


I am not sure that I am not saying something wrong, so I hope that some true expert can help us to clarify the things….

Gianni




> Il giorno 29 set 2024, alle ore 19:29, Barry Scott <72volkswagon at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> 
> I hope I'm not opening a can of worms but I have some questions about
> tuning SSB signals with the R-390/URR.
> 
> I know it works best if the LOCAL or LINE GAIN control is at maximum and to
> adjust the RF GAIN for a comfortable audio level.  What I'm wondering is
> what the proper way is to set the BFO.
> 
> I've always set it +1 for LSB and -1 for USB but I can also just leave that
> at zero and am still able to tune either sideband and now I'm wondering if
> setting the BFO + or - is mainly to get the dial to reflect the received
> frequency.  Is that an over-simplification?
> 
> I'm asking because I'm never really sure what the transmitted frequency
> is.  If I set the BFO + or -, it's only a matter of how I determine what
> sounds good (e.g. no Donald Duck, etc.) as to what the dial reads.
> 
> I apologize if that's something that should be more obvious but reading up
> on it on the web doesn't quite make full sense to me.  The discussions seem
> to revolve around whether the signal is in the IF's passband, etc., but
> like I said, it seems I'm centering the signal in the IF even if I keep the
> BFO at 0.
> 
> Thanks for any insight on this,
> Barry - N4BUQ
> ______________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



More information about the R-390 mailing list