[R-390] R-390 VFO Question
Barry
n4buq at knology.net
Wed Sep 18 11:04:15 EDT 2024
Sorry. The first line of that last paragraph had kc where it should have been MC (or Mc or MHz or...):
I don't how the counter now shows 499.7 for the VFO set at 2.9550 MC and, conversely, the VFO frequency at 500.0 is now at 2.9548 MC.
Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ
> Previously, I mentioned I have the endpoint data.
>
> VR Counter VFO Frequency (in MC)
> ---------- ---------------------
> +001.4 2.4550
> 499.7 2.9550
> -997.4 3.4550
>
> That makes the counter span for 1000 kc of the VFO to be 1000 + 1.4 + 2.6 = 1004
> kc.
>
> Switching to zeroing the VR counter at both ends:
>
> VR Counter VFO Frequency (in MC)
> ---------- ---------------------
> +000.0 2.4566
> 500.0 2.9548
> 000.0 3.4524
>
> That makes the VFO span for 1000 kc on the counter to be 3452.4 kc - 2456.6 kc =
> 995.8 kc so 4.2 kc short. Hopefully the endpoint adjustment still has that
> much left in it and I won't need to open the can and perform any surgery.
>
> I don't how the counter now shows 499.7 for the VFO set at 2.9550 and,
> conversely, the VFO frequency at 500.0 is now at 2.9548 kc. Something must've
> moved just a tiny bit since I set it.
>
> Thanks,
> Barry - N4BUQ
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Using a impossible extreme case to keep the math easy:
>>
>> If your PTO covers (say) 900KHz rather than 1000 KHz, there will be a 100KHz
>> “gap” that you can not tune to.
>>
>> Any significantly “too small” range would have the same impact. (Yes, there is a
>> bit of extra travel at the ends of the range so this does not get totally
>> insane ….).
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>> On Sep 18, 2024, at 9:54 AM, Barry <n4buq at knology.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Would a significant difference in span between bands be due to the first crystal
>>> oscillator? Otherwise, I'm not sure how that would occur.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Barry - N4BUQ
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> As long as the end points still line up so you have a 1000 KHz span with one
>>>> being at 2955, the radio should be in reasonable shape. Having a “gap” between
>>>> bands ( = a < 1000 KHz span) would be a PIA …. Fortunately that rarely is the
>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> There are still piles of R-390A’s sitting here or there ….
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 18, 2024, at 9:39 AM, Barry <n4buq at knology.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I set the PTO's frequency per the manual (i.e. set the VR counter to any 500.0
>>>>> reading and adjust the PTO to 2955 kc. The endpoint on the low side is
>>>>> different from the endpoint on the high side so I'm presuming I have just a bit
>>>>> of non-linearity; however, I think if I get the endpoints set to an even 1000
>>>>> kc, then any non-linearity will hopefully be minimal. I'm not all that
>>>>> concerned if the minor divisions aren't exact and will live with it as long
>>>>> it's not too much. The trouble to tweak that may be much more effort than it's
>>>>> worth to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wish I could've seen some of those "mountains"! I've seen pictures of the
>>>>> stacks of blue-striper R-390A/URRs that sat out in the rain. Sad.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Barry
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The gotcah is that the internal adjust coil may not have enough range to get the
>>>>>> PTO back to where it needs to be. You may need to get a bit creative. Better to
>>>>>> do this *before* any of the other work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is not a new issue. Back in the day, the military spent a lot of time and
>>>>>> money swapping out PTO’s. It was cheaper / easier to do that than doing a full
>>>>>> rebuild. There are stories of “small mountains” of PTO’s building up behind
>>>>>> repair depots as a result. Like any story, the size of those mountains likely
>>>>>> got bigger and bigger with each telling of the story :) :) :).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bob
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2024, at 8:28 AM, Barry <n4buq at knology.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Bob,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see where the PTOs for the R-390/URR and R-390A/URR both have end point
>>>>>>> adjustments. L701 performs that in both. The schematic I see for the
>>>>>>> R-390A/URR conveniently labels that as such on the schematic. RM
>>>>>>> 11-5820-357-35 calls it out on page 12, Paragraph 12-b defines the function of
>>>>>>> that coil. I just wasn't seeing that last night. I sure wish I had a
>>>>>>> searchable PDF for the R-390/URR's service manual.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Barry - N4BUQ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Motorola most certainly made their own PTO’s for the radios they supplied. Long
>>>>>>>> ago I talked to the folks who did the linearity adjustments on them. They still
>>>>>>>> had (not so) fond memories of doing those adjustments.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bob
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2024, at 11:29 PM, Barry <n4buq at knology.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Larry,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regarding the tutorials, I'm wondering which might apply to the PTO in the
>>>>>>>>> R-390A/URR. I see most(all?) of them are regarding the COSMOS units but am
>>>>>>>>> wondering which PTO is in the R-390/URR and whether any of the
>>>>>>>>> rebuild/linearity documents apply to that one. Were all the R-390/URR PTOs
>>>>>>>>> made by Collins and no COSMOS in that version?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mine is running just a bit fat - maybe 1.5 kc end-to-end. I have the actual
>>>>>>>>> numbers written down and can post that when I get back to the workbench. From
>>>>>>>>> what I remember, removing a turn shortens the end-to-end but perhaps additional
>>>>>>>>> C would work as well. I don't know what effect that might have on linearity
>>>>>>>>> but I don't think it should.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The R-390A/URR PTO has an endpoint adjustment. Does this exist for the PTO in
>>>>>>>>> an R-390/URR?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Barry - N4BUQ
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Barry, I thought what you wrote makes sense and is correct. It's good
>>>>>>>>>> that you are understanding how it all works. It makes diagnosys so much
>>>>>>>>>> easier. Good going.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you're interested in more reading on the 390A PTO's, there are 3 docs on
>>>>>>>>>> our website in the repair tutorials section by Tom Marcotte, Jim Miller and
>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards, Larry
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 5:51 AM Barry Scott <72volkswagon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, Larry. Thanks for the reply.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On further reading, the VFO is a Hartley design and, given that the
>>>>>>>>>>> frequency formula for a Hartley is an inverse function of the LC values,
>>>>>>>>>>> presuming that at xx 000, the iron core is "out" of the coil and a
>>>>>>>>>>> clockwise turn of the KC knob causes the core to be pushed further inside
>>>>>>>>>>> the coil increasing the L, then the frequency would indeed drop with CW
>>>>>>>>>>> motion of the knob. Sorry for the awkward way of stating that but I think
>>>>>>>>>>> it makes sense to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks again,
>>>>>>>>>>> Barry - N4BUQ
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Barry - N4BUQ
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 11:10 PM Larry Haney <larry41gm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Barry, You are absolutely correct in your deductions. When the KC is
>>>>>>>>>>>> at its lowest of 000, the vfo is at its highest (3.455 mh).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, Larry
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 7:23 PM Barry Scott <72volkswagon at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking at the simplified schematic for the 3rd mixer (V205), the output
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the 2nd mixer (V204) tunes from 3 to 2 MC and the VFO tunes from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.455
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC to 2.455 MC yielding a constant 455 kc mixer product. Is it correct
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpret those numbers to mean that if the counter starts at XX 000
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the KC control is rotated CW to XX +000 the VFO's output frequency
>>>>>>>>>>> starts
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at 3.455kc and falls 1000 kc for 10 turns CW on the KC knob?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm asking because I want to know what the frequency of the VFO is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be when the dial is at XX 000 and I presume it's 3.455 kc but
>>>>>>>>>>> wanting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make sure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Barry - N4BUQ
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> R-390 mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> R-390 mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>>>>>>>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>>>>>>>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>>>>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>>>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> R-390 mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>>>>>>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>>>>>>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>>>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> R-390 mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>>>>>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>>>>>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> >>>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the R-390
mailing list