[R-390] R-390 Digest, Vol 129, Issue 15
RDavis
rdavis7 at comcast.net
Wed Jan 21 10:39:22 EST 2015
Have a complete CU872/U coupler with all tubes and shields, power cord. Bought at Dayton about 10 years ago. Taking realistic offers. It's heavy! Rick K8PJQ reply rdavis7 at comcast.net
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 21, 2015, at 12:32 AM, r-390-request at mailman.qth.net wrote:
> Send R-390 mailing list submissions to
> r-390 at mailman.qth.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> r-390-request at mailman.qth.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> r-390-owner at mailman.qth.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of R-390 digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: multiple receiver coupler (Roy Morgan)
> 2. Multicouplers (Gordon Hayward)
> 3. Re: Multicouplers (Lizeth Norman)
> 4. Antenna Coupler (Steve Hobensack)
> 5. Re: Antenna Coupler (Mike McCauley)
> 6. Re: IF alignment questions and noise issue. (Dennis Wade)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:44:15 -0500
> From: Roy Morgan <k1lky68 at gmail.com>
> To: Roger Ruszkowski <flowertime01 at wmconnect.com>
> Cc: R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [R-390] multiple receiver coupler
> Message-ID: <64830F6E-4A13-4205-9CA5-E886C4F42BC8 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 3:38 PM, Roger Ruszkowski <flowertime01 at wmconnect.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> Fair Radio has a CU872 antenna coupler for $45.00 on the shelf.
>> It needs 20 each 6922 tubes.
>
> Would-be MultiCoupler folks,
>
> I searched fair radio sales web site and can only find the manual for these:
> MM-CU-872A - CU-872A Maintenance Manual Theory, maintenance , schematics. Repro,
> $21.00 each
>
> I have two files of notes on multicoplers, both include more extensive experience and advice from Roger. There is a lot of info on the CU-872 and some on other types of military multi couplers.
>
> In summary about the CU-872:
> - It passes from 2 mc up past 30 mc
> - has nearly zero gain
> - does not add noticeable noise to the signals it handles
> - the 2 mc high pass filter can be easily bypassed
> - were normally run 24/7 for 6 months before being checked for performance/weak tubes.
>
> ?Glad to mail these to anyone interested.
>
> Roy
>
>
> Roy Morgan
> RoyMorgan at alum.mit.edu
> K1LKY Since 1958
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:59:54 -0500 (EST)
> From: Gordon Hayward <ghayward at uoguelph.ca>
> To: R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [R-390] Multicouplers
> Message-ID:
> <289337132.16685255.1421704794258.JavaMail.root at uoguelph.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I built the one designed by Phil Atchley (http://www.schmitzhouse.com/Johns_Electronics_24.htm).
> It's fairly flat from 10 kHz to 1 MHz then the gain rises. To keep intermod down, the output
> transistors run hard - it gets hot! But, it seems to work and it isn't expensive.
> Cheers, Gord VE3EOS
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:05:55 -0500
> From: Lizeth Norman <normanlizeth at gmail.com>
> To: "r-390 at mailman.qth.net" <R-390 at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [R-390] Multicouplers
> Message-ID:
> <CAJUhCTPMQGZ22HaJc+Mq791RThnWY5BxP2VOK2oVXztJEpm+gA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> I've got two multicouplers. One in the rack with the HF boatanchors,
> The other is for the UHF/VHF antennas so that I can use an SDR while I
> use a real radio.
> The UHF/VHF unit is a Stridsberg.
> The HF unit is kit built using plans/boards designed by W8ZR.
> My vote is for the Stridsberg. Chatted with them on the phone because
> of a slightly non standard order. Seem to be a nice group of people.
> Fast shipping.
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Gordon Hayward <ghayward at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>> I built the one designed by Phil Atchley (http://www.schmitzhouse.com/Johns_Electronics_24.htm).
>> It's fairly flat from 10 kHz to 1 MHz then the gain rises. To keep intermod down, the output
>> transistors run hard - it gets hot! But, it seems to work and it isn't expensive.
>> Cheers, Gord VE3EOS
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> R-390 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:11:18 -0500
> From: Steve Hobensack <stevehobensack at hotmail.com>
> To: r390 reflector <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: [R-390] Antenna Coupler
> Message-ID: <BLU172-W288C1A348A258AF3479178CA4B0 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Back in the day, CATV systems had splitters, both active and passive . Lots of isolation between F fitting ports. Bottom frequency was 5 mHz. Perhaps todays standards require a lower bottom frequency? Has anyone tried splitters on hf receivers?
>
> Steve N8YE
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:21:33 +0000
> From: "Mike McCauley" <mlmccauley at att.net>
> To: R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [R-390] Antenna Coupler
> Message-ID: <emcfc1fef0-48e9-488f-bd2b-bf2c42995469 at asus>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8
>
>
> As I understand, the "traditional" cable systems are now up in the low
> GHz range, and ADSL is fiber up to the last mile, and then VLF over
> single or dual twisted pair. That's what I've heard, anyway.
>
> In Dallas, I know that Time Warner uses a "traditional" RF system, and
> it's up in the 1-3GHz range. Everything but the house drops is 1"+ hard
> line. AT&T U-Verse is fiber except for the last mile. Unknown if that is
> uniform across the CONUS.
>
> I see the old line amps and splitters now and then at the hamfests. The
> chassis would be nice to use as a foundation for a multicoupler, but I
> don't know about "as is".
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Steve Hobensack" <stevehobensack at hotmail.com>
> To: "r390 reflector" <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: 1/20/2015 7:11:18 AM
> Subject: [R-390] Antenna Coupler
>
>> Back in the day, CATV systems had splitters, both active and passive .
>> Lots of isolation between F fitting ports. Bottom frequency was 5 mHz.
>> Perhaps todays standards require a lower bottom frequency? Has anyone
>> tried splitters on hf receivers?
>>
>> Steve N8YE
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> R-390 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:32:35 -0800
> From: Dennis Wade <sacramento.cyclist at gmail.com>
> To: Roger Ruszkowski <flowertime01 at wmconnect.com>
> Cc: R-390 HF Receiver List <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [R-390] IF alignment questions and noise issue.
> Message-ID:
> <CA+NMxSHN3kPT3J==9yzxM5mSFKVoTDbkCAM=qc+GK5tk5MmKtw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Thank you Roger. You are of course perfectly correct, there is no
> substitute for a proper analysis and diagnosis. I have no intention of
> going in there without knowing pretty much what I'm looking for and where
> it is.
>
> Never the less, yesterday I let it cook for a while to see what happened.
> After a while listening to a local BCB station, I noticed some distortion.
> This sounded disturbingly familiar, so I put the HP 410C on the AGC line.
> It measured only about -4 volts. Backing off the RF gain got rid of the
> distortion. Classic low AGC. Throughout the noise was present. Wouldn't
> be surprised if they were connected.
>
> Probably won't post again till the weekend...busy week ahead.
>
> Thanks for everyone's advice.
>
> Dennis
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Roger Ruszkowski <
> flowertime01 at wmconnect.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Dennis,
>>
>> Its a mixing thing.
>>
>> A stage is making noise.
>> It depends on what it has to mix with to determine if it comes out in the
>> audio.
>>
>> Stop guessing.
>> Start a proper systematic trouble shooting sequence.
>>
>> Roger AI4NI
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dennis Wade <sacramento.cyclist at gmail.com>
>> To: Roger Ruszkowski <flowertime01 at wmconnect.com>
>> Cc: R-390 HF Receiver List <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Sun, Jan 18, 2015 11:33 pm
>> Subject: Re: [R-390] IF alignment questions and noise issue.
>>
>>
>> Thank you Roger. I'll work on those tests this week.
>>
>>
>> A little more information after playing with it more last night. Its
>> definitely present on all bands.
>>
>>
>> Disconnecting the RF deck at J208 stops the bacon frying.
>>
>>
>> Pulling V201 stops the noise. Re installing V201, and then pulling the
>> 1st mixer, etc on down the chain I can still hear the frying, but at a
>> reduced level. I noted that the only silver mica in the signal path on all
>> bands is the 33pf grid coupling cap. The others are ceramic or other types.
>>
>>
>> Another list member was puzzled by being still able to hear the noise with
>> the mixers pulled and wondered if the AGC line was involved. At his
>> suggestion I looked at the AGC bus with a scope and could see some noise in
>> tandem with what I was hearing. I also grounded the AGC bus which silenced
>> the noise, and indeed the noise is completely gone in MGC mode. By the
>> way, its clearly a heat related problem, I turned on the receiver this
>> afternoon about 2:15. The noise didn't show up until after 4. I almost
>> declared is a ghost.
>>
>>
>> And finally, prior to discovering the noise, I had been working with the
>> IF deck checking alignment and setting gain. No noise whatsoever after
>> several hours powered on. It really seems to be narrowed to the RF deck,
>> possibly a component on the AGC line? I'm headed back to the schematic and
>> see what's there.
>>
>>
>> And thanks to all for the DC block responses.
>>
>>
>> Dennis
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Roger Ruszkowski <
>> flowertime01 at wmconnect.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dennis,
>>
>> Does the receiver fry bacon on all frequencies.
>> If you are frying bacon under 7.999 as well as over then the first mixer
>> and 17 Mhz osc are OK.
>>
>> Inject 455 Mhz at 150 micro volts into the If deck at J518.
>> Set the band width to 2Khz
>> set the BFO off
>> Adjust the IF gain for -7 volts on the DC load.
>> Set the generator modulation on at 30 %
>> Observe about 1/2 watt on the local output across a 600 ohm load.
>>
>> Listen for your frying bacon and be certain it is not in the IF deck.
>> Set the generator to CW and observe a 28 - 30 DB drop in signal level at
>> the local audio output
>> on the back panel.
>>
>> If your IF deck and audio do not pass this test start fixing problems in
>> the IF and Audio deck.
>>
>> pull V203 the second mixer.
>> Set the receiver to some number over 8 Mhz.
>> Inject 455 Mhz into E 211.
>> reduce the generator level until the DC load level is - 7 volts.
>>
>> Repeat the noise test. you may only get 20 : 1 or better but not 28 - 30
>> DB difference.
>> Listen for your frying bacon and be certain it is not in the third mixer
>> and VFO.
>>
>> Pull the RF tube V201
>> Do the math and inject a frequency into E210
>> Listen for your frying bacon and be certain it is not in the second mixer
>> and crystal oscillator deck
>>
>> If you fry bacon only under 7.997 you have a first mixer and 17 Mhz osc
>> problem.
>>
>> If you got this far you have an RF Amp V201 problem.
>>
>> Go looking for a sliver mica cap as suggested.
>>
>> Open the ground lug bolt and retighten it on any cap to ground you suspect
>> before you
>> just replace it.
>>
>> You can turn the receiver up on end and work on the RF deck was it hangs
>> out of the receiver.
>>
>> You just can not go dialing the VFO all over.
>> But set the VFO to 500 KHz and you can work up and down the Mhz at the 500
>> KHZ point.
>>
>> Its enough to trouble shoot the problem.
>>
>> Roger AI4NI
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dennis Wade <sacramento.cyclist at gmail.com>
>> To: R-390 HF Receiver List <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Sat, Jan 17, 2015 10:05 pm
>> Subject: [R-390] IF alignment questions and noise issue.
>>
>>
>> Good evening,
>>
>> Setting out to check alignment of the variable IF stages, and the
>> Y2K manual states to couple the generator through "Test Lead CX-1363/U" to
>> test points E209 and E210.
>>
>> I have an HP8657B, and my guess is the test lead mentioned above
>> isolates the generator from the receiver, probably through a DC block. How
>> to you all couple a modern generator to those test points in practice?
>>
>> Noise issue: The RF deck (that some may remember had shorted B+
>> cap) now seems to develop a "bacon frying" sound several minutes after a
>> cold start. I've isolated the noise to the RF deck by unplugging J208 when
>> the noise is present and it completely goes away. I've also swapped all
>> the tubes in the signal path with no change.
>>
>> Any ideas on how I might isolate the noise to a stage in the RF
>> deck?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dennis
>>
>> --
>> "If they trust you, it is an extraordinary privilege, and you simply can't
>> abuse it."
>> - A. Alan Post 1914-2011. California Legislative Analyst 1949-1977.
>>
>> -------------------------
>> Dennis L. Wade
>> KG6ZI
>> Carmichael, CA
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> R-390 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> R-390 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> "If they trust you, it is an extraordinary privilege, and you simply can't
>> abuse it."
>> - A. Alan Post 1914-2011. California Legislative Analyst 1949-1977.
>>
>> -------------------------
>> Dennis L. Wade
>> KG6ZI
>> Carmichael, CA
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> R-390 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "If they trust you, it is an extraordinary privilege, and you simply can't
> abuse it."
> - A. Alan Post 1914-2011. California Legislative Analyst 1949-1977.
>
> -------------------------
> Dennis L. Wade
> KG6ZI
> Carmichael, CA
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of R-390 Digest, Vol 129, Issue 15
> **************************************
More information about the R-390
mailing list