[R-390] Synthetic Oil
Charles Steinmetz
csteinmetz at yandex.com
Fri Jul 25 16:12:28 EDT 2014
Tom wrote:
>I was taught early on that when lubing a "sleeve bearing" motor to
>always use non-detergent, as the detergent additive would "glaze"
>the sleeve bearing and cause premature wear.
I have heard this, but I started using Mobil 1 for almost everything
more than 35 years ago and have never seen this problem (or any
problem, for that matter). I have a window fan that runs 24/7 from
(roughly) March to November to cool the attic. Before Mobil 1, the
sleeve bearings needed lubrication 3 or 4 times per season. I used
M1 on it way back then, and I think I may have relubricated it 3
times since (about once per decade). Most of the sleeve bearings I
have lubricated with it have *never* been lubricated again. So
whatever the theoretical problem is (or perhaps it was an empirical
problem that was wrongly attributed to detergent), there does not
seem to be any problem in practice with M1 motor oil (I can't speak
for any other products).
Detergent keeps tiny metal particles (worn off of beaings) suspended
in the oil, while non-detergent oil lets them settle out. In a
splash-lubricated gearbox or crankcase (for example), we use ND oil
to let the metal dust settle to the bottom of the sump where they
don't constantly circulate through the bearings. With pressure
lubrication (car engine crankcases, for example) we filter the oil,
which removes the suspended metal particles, so we can use detergent
oil without suspended metal particles being a problem. In a typical
sleeve bearing installation, there is no sump and no place for metal
dust to fall out -- there is only the oil between the bearing
surfaces -- so there is no disadvantage *from this source* (suspended
metal particles) to using detergent oil.
Best regards,
Charles
More information about the R-390
mailing list