[R-390] A vs non A
Jim Green
jagreen3 at sbcglobal.net
Wed Oct 10 17:49:52 EDT 2012
I don't post very often, but this topic intrigued me. I have a good
example of a Motorola R-390 and a EAC R-390A. I have gone through the
R-390A using the Y2K manual and replaced all the old caps and out of
spec resistors. I have solidified the rectifiers in the PS, but it is
reversible should I come across a couple of good original tubes. That
was last winters project. It was time consuming, but quite enjoyable.
I'm planning to do the same with the Motorola R-390, but the build of
the circuits in some of the modules look much more difficult to work
on. However, I believe the effort will be worth it.
As it stands, I think the R-390 is a better performer than the R-390A.
However, your milage may differ. A good question to ask yourself is do
I plan to listen to SSB and CW most of the time? Or am I going to
listen to AM signals?
I listen to AM signal more often. I prefer the Xtal filters in the
R-390 for this reason. I find the Mechanical filters in the R-390A are
a bit harsh, and ringy compared the the xtal filters. That being said,
The S/N ratio is the big thing, and they both kick A in that department.
I also have a very nice R-392. Not a real competitor in the R-390
race, but it has the advantage of being dust-proof & it works well in
my woodworking shop.
Jim
More information about the R-390
mailing list