[R-390] Counting Systems [joke]

[Steve Toth]

But what type style would you have to use for the Y2k rev. 4 if roman numerals were used?  Should the type style go to Times New Roman or Helvetica?  And sumerian sexagesimal would necessitate something like this !  ;-)








-- Steve 
"Think Quickly, Speak Slowly, Work Diligently, Live Simply"

--- On Thu, 3/17/11, James A. (Andy) Moorer <jamminpower at earthlink.net> wrote:


From: James A. (Andy) Moorer <jamminpower at earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [R-390] Counting Systems [joke]
To: r-390 at mailman.qth.net
Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 6:39 AM


   Or, more simply, just the R-CCCXC non-A. No darn zeros needed! And 
don't forget it's successor, the R-CCCXC non-non-A
-A

On 3/16/2011 10:26 PM, Tisha Hayes wrote:
> I had thought of converting all of the numbering in the Y2K to the Sumerian
> sexagesimal<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexagesimal>  counting system (base
> 60 with cuneiform wedge writing).
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_numerals
>
> I actually have the font set.
>


-- 
James A. (Andy) Moorer
www.jamminpower.com

______________________________________________________________
R-390 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html