[R-390] Regulated filament voltage
rbethman
rbethman at comcast.net
Sun Feb 20 11:17:38 EST 2011
When one considers the time frame that these radios were built and
used, the methods of providing the the power source, and the overall
use, the entire voltage regulation thread is pretty moot.
The AN/GRC-26D used R-390As in the communications "box" on the rear end
of a 2 1/2 ton truck. The power was provided by a generator - of
limited ability to track voltages when the BC-610, T-213, and /or T-368
was keyed up.
Any "hairball" idea to build a SS voltage regulator is ridiculous, since
it creates internal noise to a receiver that was designed to be
SENSITIVE. The use of 3TF7s, 12BA6s, or the 40 to 50 Ohm @10W resistor
is more than adequate.
This entire idea of "attempting" to regulate the filaments of the PTO
and BFO is like suddenly deciding that you wand Solid State and Digital
Readout precision. (That's all flawed in itself! Whom is it that has
the *correct* zero beat with WWV? The signal path pretty well throws
that all over the charts.)
I take it that "some" would like to include a circuit with GPS ability?
Yep! That will really keep the "noise" out - NOT!
Why is it that some folks simply cannot leave this wonderful working
design alone? I certainly have YET to see or hear a single individual
whom has the mental and design wherewithal that equals, much less
*exceeds* the collective knowledge and wisdom of the entire Collins team.
Bob - N0DGN
On 2/20/2011 10:52 AM, Bernie Doran wrote:
> If regulated fil voltage is so important, why not just regulate the AC line
> voltage and perhaps drop it down a bit? That pretty much covers everthing.
More information about the R-390
mailing list