[R-390] Average Ham Shack

[rbethman]

I find just as much enjoyment with R-390As and SP-600s.

I guess if a K2 suits you, go for it!

I run separate transmitter and receiver in my shack.  There is a great 
deal of joy in doing just that.

I'm tired of the $10K transceiver that is SS that you can't even work on 
with SMT equipment.

Guess it in the eyes and ears of the beholder.

Bob - N0DGN

Shoppa, Tim wrote:
> It's not that they can't do the job.
>
> But a ham-targeted receiver just feels "right" in tuning the ham bands in a way a general coverage receiver doesn't.
>
> It's not specifically a 390A vs 75A thing by any means.
>
> I think it's just as true today comparing a K2 with a fancy-pants Rhodes and Schwartz HF radio. The ham radio is more enjoyable to use on the ham bands.
>
> Tim.
>
>   

-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|               AM Amateur Radio Operator    NØDGN                 |   
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|               http://home.comcast.net/~rbethman/                 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bob Bethman                \\\|///     " The absence of a danger |
|                           \\ ~ ~ //      signal does *NOT* mean  |
| rbethman at comcast.net      (/ @ @ /)      that everything is OK " |
+----------------------o00o---°(_)°---o00o-------------------------+