[R-390] A Few Questions
DJED1 at aol.com
DJED1 at aol.com
Thu Jan 15 10:05:19 EST 2009
Sounds pretty normal to me. If you center the BFO in the passband, you will
hear both sides of the signal as you tune off. If you choose 2 Kc
bandwidth, for example, and offset the BFO by 1.2 Kc, you should eliminate most of one
sideband, while the other sideband should be good until you've tuned off by
about 2 kc. To check the BFO alignment, set the BFO to center on the
narrowest passband (0.1 Kc) by peaking up the signal at that filter setting, then
loosen the BFO knob and set for 0 when it is zero beat with the signal.
The audio filter is intended for very tight CW work, and if I remember right
is tuned to about 700 cycles. So you must peak up the signal in the IF
filter, then set the BFO to give you a 700 cycle beatnote, then turn on the audio
filter. It's very effective for weak CW signals.
I'm not much of a CW man, but I used the audio filter to make a frequency
measurement a while back: I bought a HP synthesized generator that reads out
to 1 Hz, and I wanted to see how accurate it was by comparing it to WWV. I
coupled the generator to the antenna so I could hear the beat note between WWV
and the generator. Well, between the modulation and noise on WWV I couldn't
tell the zero beat to much better than 10s of Hz, so I offset the generator to
10.000700, turned on the audio filter, and hooked up a frequency counter to
the audio output. The filter cleaned up all the noise, and the counter could
read the 700 Hz signal to about +-1 Hz, and that was close enough for me.
Generator was dead on.
The generator makes it a snap to check the linearity of the PTO without
taking things apart to hook up a counter to the PTO.
Ed
**************Inauguration '09: Get complete coverage from the nation's
capital. (http://news.aol.com/main/politics/inauguration?ncid=emlcntusnews00000003)
More information about the R-390
mailing list