[R-390] UnBal for R-390A
rbethman
rbethman at comcast.net
Sun Jan 4 13:10:15 EST 2009
Tisha,
Stick with your un-bal methodology. This uses the best of the input
circuitry. There is ONE other aspect to consider. When performing an
alignment with a sig gen, the sig gen's impedance is what you will have
peaked the input for. So it "may" turn out that the 120 ohm figure is
not the best. Use the balanced input, but make your un-bal to match the
sig gen's impedance.
My $0.02 worth, and worth every bit of it!
Bob - N0DGN
Tisha Hayes wrote:
> Has anyone made a un-bal for the balanced antenna connection on the
> R-390A to bring it down to a 50 ohm unbalanced connection?
>
> I have a hand-wound 2.5:1 balun with overlapped windings with Litz
> wire on a FT-75 core (125 ohm to 50 ohm). What I would like to know is
> if I should make another one of these things for my other receiver or
> I should go the easy route and use a single wire into the unbalanced
> connector or just use the C connector for my antenna.
>
> My guidebook has been;
> www.dxing.info/equipment/*impedance*_*transformer*_bryant2.doc
> <http://www.dxing.info/equipment/impedance_transformer_bryant2.doc>
>
> It seems that most folks get great results with the easy route. What
> have been your experiences?
>
> Any suggestions?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
--
Bob - NØDGN
More information about the R-390
mailing list