[R-390] Need a RF slug for a R-390A
ANTHONY CASORSO
canthony15 at msn.com
Thu Apr 9 12:33:15 EDT 2009
It was one of the goals of the R-390a (cost reduction) to reduce cost. It is written up in the engineering report. I quote:
"
Finally, all RF coils were designed to use this same type of
ferrite core. In addition to their higher permeability, these cores also have
a higher Q, helping to overcome the loss of image response resulting from the
elimination of one RF stage. The VIF coils have also been redesigned for use
of a common core. This core differs from that used in RF coils however because
this application called for a lower permeability, higher Q core.
"
And elsewhere in that document:
"
Later work
showed that similar results could be obtained using the larger coil diameter
with a ferrite core to replace the powdered iron slug. All the RF coils have
since been redesigned to use the same ferrite core. These new coils also have
a higher Q than those in the current R-390. The variable IF coils have also
been redesigned to use a common core. This core however differs from that used
in RF coils, because a lower permeability higher Q core was needed.
"
This document is available on the www.r-390a.net site under "references".
Tony
> From: Flowertime01 at wmconnect.com
> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:43:31 -0400
> To: r-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [R-390] Need a RF slug for a R-390A
>
> Fellows,
>
> I think you are right on the R390/A slugs.
> There are only two kinds. RF and IF.
>
> We could look in the 35P manual and see how many different part numbers
> their are.
>
> Roger AI4NI
> ______________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the R-390
mailing list