[R-390] TEST EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION
Jon Schlegel
ews265 at rochester.rr.com
Fri Jan 25 18:50:17 EST 2008
Hi Harold,
I guess the next item I'd add would be a signal generator. For
general receiver work you really need a generator that's stable, RF
tight and with a correctly operating attenuator. There is nothing
more perturbing than setting the attenuator to max and having the
receiver under test still responding to the generator signal due to
the RF it is "spraying" or leaking around the attenuator.
My personal favorite sig gen is the HP 8640B but it's not vacuum tube
and is prone to an aging problem of nylon gear
breakage. Nevertheless the 8640B is reasonably easy to work on and
with patience, the broken gears are typically fixable.
I know that there are other common vacuum tube generators that will
fit the bill but I'm not really up to speed on what's
available. Perhaps others on the list can help out there.
Regards,
Jon Schlegel, WA3MVM
At 06:13 PM 1/25/2008 -0500, you wrote:
>I would appreciate knowing what The List Recommends in order to do a
>good an accurate job of electrical restoration and maintenence (Not
>physical restoration). My collection includes an R-390A, a dozen
>pieces of Collins S-Line and some E.F Johnson.
>
>I probably have little more test equipment than what the average Ham
>has; good VOM, VTVM, Scope and a few pieces of HeathKit.
>
>Since I am only working on my own equipment, I don't want to move to
>the level of A Service Monitor, etc. Perhaps the Tube Type would be
>best as i could fix it if it breaks. Models and Manufacturer would be great.
>
>All recommendations graciously accepted.
>
>Harold
>
>
>_____________________________________________________________
>R-390 mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
>Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
More information about the R-390
mailing list