[R-390] R-390a question (Tony Casorso)
Tony Casorso
canthony15 at msn.com
Wed Feb 13 16:24:39 EST 2008
Hi Rich,
Fantastic! Thanks so much for this information. Looking at the circuit I can
see that the Lankford mod would affect the delay but it looked like there
would still be some offset. I wasn't sure though. Your data tells the story.
This matches up with my receiver to a Tee.
I used 4148 diodes and promptly blew up the one across R547. I replaced it
with a higher voltage type and it is OK so far. Yes it is a great mod for
listening to SSB.
Thanks again.
Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: <SHELLY199 at aol.com>
To: <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 2:06 PM
Subject: [R-390] R-390a question (Tony Casorso)
Hi Tony Casorso and everyone,
Hope this will give you an assist with your AGC vs. MGC for your Lankford
modified IF deck. I personally prefer the Lankford mod over the stock IF.
The ssb is so easy to tune it’s amazing. The mod does alter the AGC
characteristics. With the mod, the AGC voltage for a specified rf input
level is
approx. doubled that of an unmodified deck. Also, the AGC delay no longer
exists.
Here are some #’s I found in my notebook. This data was taken comparing
two decks. One with the mod and one without. Both decks had been setup
to
give -7 volts diode load voltage in MGC with 455 KHz into P513 and 4 KHz
bandwidth. The signal level into the IF deck was varied and the AGC
monitored.
Results are below. Note the rf and mixer stages are not in the signal
path.
Unmodified deck
Input lel AGC
145uv -0.00 this level is threshold of delayed AGC
150uv -0.21
300uv -1.09
600uv -2.46
900uv - 3.23
1mv -3.42
Modified deck
Input lel AGC Diode Load Diode Load in MGC
150uv -1.77 -3.32 -7.00
300uv -2.96 -3,81 -13.86
450uv -3.70 -4.13 -20.83
600uv -4.28 -4.29 -27.98
900uv -5.11 -4.76 - 41.42
1mv -5.33 -4.85 -45.70
In answer to your question about a reduction of 12 db from MGC to AGC this
is normal with this mod when a good antenna is connected. Checking on two
separate rcvrs, both with the mod and an antenna connected to both rcvrs,
switching from MGC to AGC decreased the line Lel meter by 11 DB. FYI, In
the AGC
mode the AGC was -1.9 Vdc, the diode load was -1.8 Vdc and the carrier
meter
15 Db
Going a step further I measured the AGC and MGC at both rcvrs with no
antenna connected. That gave a reduction of only 2 Db switching from MGC
to AGC.
The measurements below were taken with the antenna disconnected and with
and
without the calibrator on and the rcvr tuned to 100KHz increment. The
results are below:
67 EAC Imperial
Noise only Noise only
AGC Diode Load AGC Diode Load
-0.62 -0.19 -0.55 -.47
Calibrator on Calibrator on
-6.3 -3.0 -6.5 -3.1
If you get similar readings you have the Lankford mod in the IF deck. Just
one word of caution-watch the 1N4148 diodes. Switching the AGC time
constant
will deteriorate one of the diodes because of a fairly high voltage
transient during the switch operation. I once measured it because I got
tired of
changing diodes but don’t remember the transient voltage value. To
evaluate the
diodes you have to unsolder one end because of the parallel ckt
resistances.
I ended up with a 1N914 and a 1N5060. If you notice distortion on a
very
strong broadcast station check the diodes.
Bye
Rich
**************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
Awards. Go to AOL Music.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565)
_____________________________________________________________
R-390 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
More information about the R-390
mailing list