[R-390] WWV kebelsa Frequency Standard
William J. Neill
wjneill at consolidated.net
Sat Dec 6 18:38:46 EST 2008
Gee, and to think that not so long ago, this list was all but dead.
Just lookit the new venues its slobbered off to.
WJN
On Dec 6, 2008, at 5:28 PM, rbethman wrote:
> That is PRECISELY why I specified FULLY SMOKED kielbasa!
>
> When it is fully smoked, the fat is reduced to the equivalent level
> OR less than beef jerky.
>
> I've been making kielbasa AND beef jerky for over thirty years. LOL
>
> Bob - N0DGN
>
> William J. Neill wrote:
>> With prejudice on my part, I think beef jerky the superior product
>> from a purely technical perspective simply because when energized,
>> it does not tend to cook in its own fat, so to speak, as kielbasa
>> is wont to do. Such a tendency can, of course, have a deleterious
>> effect upon any components adjacent to the kielbasa unless the
>> kielbasa is properly encased and, ideally, vented.
>>
>> Venting is crucial simply because it is known, through extensive
>> testing by the A&M Ag School, that kielbasa fumes, if allowed to
>> accumulate, have the same explosive propensities as an empty
>> bottle once containing acetylene. You cannot run full business
>> after a kielbasa vapour explosion in your rig. As it is, such an
>> event will attract what will be very unwanted attn by the XYL.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Bill Neill
>>
>> On Dec 6, 2008, at 5:01 PM, rbethman wrote:
>>
>>> This could be up for a REAL test! I wonder how beef jerky
>>> compares to fully smoked kielbasa
>>>
>>> Bob - N0DGN
>
> --
> Bob - NØDGN
>
More information about the R-390
mailing list