[R-390] IBOC

Bob Young youngbob53 at msn.com
Tue Oct 23 02:08:15 EDT 2007


IBOC is trouble Roy, it is bad news on FM where it severely cuts the range, 
most people need an outside antenna to get across town stations and it is 
especially bad on the AM band. A station which used to be about 10 Kc wide 
now takes up 30 Kc, which means that for example WOR 710 now completely 
obliterates WLW 700 and WGN 720 here in MA. Although depending on 
propagation, some nights WLW obliterates WOR, other nights they ALL 
obliterate each other as they all run iBlock at night. It is becoming a big 
mess and it has hardly begun, less than 5% of AM stations are running it. 
The digital sidebands sound like some kind of terrible white noise and cover 
the adjacent channels with noise. If this is allowed to continue the AM BCB 
will die and be left to a few big 50 KW stations which is probably what they 
and iNiquity want anyway.

These links will provide you with some of the opposition from broadcasters, 
industry people and DX'ers alike, about the only people who like are the 
ones making money from it. It is a monoploy, ONE company owns the rights to 
it, licenses it and makes ALL the money from it.

http://www.wrathofkahn.org/

http://am-iboc.blogspot.com/

http://www.stopiboc.com/bythenumbers.html

Bob
KB1OKL


From: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa at wmata.com>
To: "Richard Loken" <richardlo at admin.athabascau.ca>, "Roy Morgan" 
<roy.morgan at nist.gov>
Cc: r-390 at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [R-390] IBOC - was R-390a Image problem?
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 2:26 PM

Roy wrote:
>>What is "IBOC"?

>I am as yet ignorant about IBOC.  I see that it means In Band On Channel 
>(Digital) transmission.  I suspect this will be trouble.

It's not all that bad.




More information about the R-390 mailing list