[R-390] Oldham Coupler Idea
Flowertime01 at wmconnect.com
Flowertime01 at wmconnect.com
Sun Nov 18 13:04:01 EST 2007
Jon,
On most receivers the shaft alignment is very good.
The shafts and coupler have more than enough mechanical stiffness.
With the original specified spring, the spring provided enough tension to
keep the coupler parts "lashed" together to remove slop but not so much tension
as to deform the shafts.
In mechanical assemblies, the order in which retainers are tightened often
have a big effect on the final alignment. You may want to consider "resetting"
your VFO if you feel yours is too far out of alignment. If that work still
leaves your VFO with more offset in the coupler than you would like, you can start
to file mounting holes to get more freedom and range of adjustment.
You should be able to reset the VFO to remove all angle off set so the
coupler faces set flat to each other.
Most couplers are die cast and the face of each side is not real square to
the bore. This is an effect of cooling casting or not an exact drill press to
jig alignment during manufacturing. It is close enough for government work. Live
with this. Some times flopping one coupler side around 180 degree will get a
better fit. You get the error in each side to complement for a best fit.
There is some shaft to shaft off set.
You can adjust out the side to side off set.
If the off set is from the VFO setting to close to the chassis it can be
shimmed to remove the off set.
If the VFO sets to high, you will likely have to live with that off set of do
a major over haul of the front box assembly to can front plate on the VFO to
adjust the off set.
Mostly life is good enough and we just live with it as is. That coupler with
one spring will compensate for the range of offset.
I hope this provides enough depth to help you get your receiver into a
mechanical condition you can live with without modifying your coupler.
Once you get the alignment correct, more springs just are not needed.
The coupler becomes a method to effect module disassembly and repair, as
opposed to a device to compensate for poor part fabrication.
Roger AI4NI </HTML>
More information about the R-390
mailing list