[R-390] Oldham Coupler Idea
Jon Schlegel
ews265 at rochester.rr.com
Sat Nov 17 22:54:09 EST 2007
Joe,
Is there a likelihood that this will degrade backlash or is there
something else that I'm missing here?
Regards,
Jon
At 07:09 PM 11/17/2007 -0800, you wrote:
>That does not need to be done.
>
>Joe
>
>
>
>
>--- Jon Schlegel <ews265 at rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I was just looking at the three Oldham coupler
> > pieces and the effect
> > that the antibacklash spring has on them. The
> > single spring has a
> > tendency to put the two shafts into shear which
> > would seem to create
> > an unnecessary radial load on both shafts. The
> > gears on the RF
> > module have two springs. Why didn't the coupler
> > designer add a
> > second set of pins for a second spring? I was
> > thinking of adding a
> > second set of springs myself. Any thoughts on this?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jon
> >
> >
> >
>_____________________________________________________________
> > R-390 mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> > Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> > Unsubscribe:
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
> >
>
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>Be a better pen pal.
>Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See
>how. http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/
>_____________________________________________________________
>R-390 mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
>Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
More information about the R-390
mailing list