[R-390] Measuring Sensitivity
n4buq at knology.net
n4buq at knology.net
Fri Mar 9 14:38:33 EST 2007
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:38:06 -0500, Roy Morgan <roy.morgan at nist.gov> wrote :
> At 09:27 AM 3/9/2007, n4buq at knology.net wrote:
> >... I'm interested in measuring the sensitivity of my R390A and I have
> >a signal generator (GR1001A) that has a 10-ohm output. I have an adapter
> >that houses a 40-ohm resistor that matches the output to a 50-ohm cable.
>
> Barry,
>
> The GR 1001A is one of my favorite generators, so I have some information
> and ideas for you:
>
> The manual for this thing is on BAMA. Reading it and puzzling out what
is
> going on is a good idea. (Link is below.)
>
> The 1001A has an odd set of output impedances. "The output impedance at
> the ATTENuator jack is 10 ohms for all except the 100 MV MULTIPLIER
> setting, where the output impedance is 50 ohms."
>
> >When I feed the balanced input with this (40 ohm weries unit), there is
an
> >obvious mismatch between the 50-ohm cable and the input.
>
> Yes, but it may not be severe. The input impedance of the R-390A may
vary
> from about 50 ohms to about 700 ohms depending on frequency, tuning of
the
> input circuit, and component variations. I quote from MIL-R-13947b, the
> Military Specification for the R-390/URR ("non-A").
>
> "3.13.3 Antenna input impedance.- The rated input impedance for the
balanced
> input circuit shall be 125 ohms. In the range from 500 kc to 16 mc, the
> measured input impedance shall not be less than 50 ohms nor greater than
> 375 ohms; for the range from 16 mc to 32 mc the measured input impedance
> shall be not less than 100 ohms nor greater than 700 ohms."
>
> If you accept the fact that the input impedance actually does vary over
> such a range, then you can do a number of things:
> 1) Make sure you can reasonably expect the actual RF voltage at the
antenna
> terminals to be what you think it is. (This is relatively simple to do.)
> 2) Simply follow the manual procedure for sensitivity measurement,
keeping
> in mind that the maintenance manual procedure is meant to deliver radios
to
> service that are meeting some sort of minimum performance measure, not
make
> an accurate measurement of actual sensitivity.
> 3) Measure the input impedance of the radio and do a bunch of figuring.
> 4) Just wing it with informed engineering as Collins seems to have with
the
> S-line.
>
> >...how do I determine how much signal is present at the radio for a
given
> >setting on the generator?
>
> The 1001A generator will deliver to the output end of a (relatively
short)
> cable the voltage level indicated by the panel meter and cotrols if:
> - on the 100 microvolt setting there is only the cable
> - on other settings, the 40 ohm series resistor unit is in place.
>
> NOTE: If you terminate the cable with 50 ohms, in either case above, the
> actual voltage at the termination will be ONE HALF what the panel
controls
> indicate.
>
> Realizing this, if you simply use the 40 ohm series unit, and feed the
> R-390 balanced input (one side grounded) with the end of the un
terminated
> cable, AND you make the assumption that the input impedance if the radio
is
> 125 ohms or more, you will have somewhere between the voltage indicated
on
> the generator and half that. This is equivalent to method 4 above.
>
> Note: it is quite clear from the reports of a Collins List member, who
has
> spoken to at least one of the design engineers who was at Collins during
> the S-line production period, that they simply ran a simple cable from
the
> generator output to the radio, and took the panel indications as the
value
> of the input voltage. The generators they used were meant to deliver
> indicated voltage when the output was terminated in 50 ohms. This works
> out pretty well, IF the input impedance/resistance of the radio is
> approximately 50 ohms. I don't yet have any idea of what the actual
input
> impedance of S-line radios is.
>
>
> > I realize I need to make up a matching network at the
> >termination of the 50-ohm cable where it connects to the receiver, but
not
> >sure how all these matching networks play into the signal levels between
> >the generator and the radio.
>
>
> Here is what I suggest, if you want to "Make sure you can reasonably
expect
> the actual RF voltage at the antenna terminals to be what you think it
is."
>
> Make up a voltage divider with a 50 ohm resistor and a one-half ohm
> resistor in series from the input to ground. The output is taken off the
> one-half ohm resistor. This will do a number of things:
> - It will present a 50.5 ohm load to the end of the cable from the
generator.
> - It will divide the voltage at it's input by 100.
> - It will let the cable operate at 50 ohms, so there will be no or little
> standing waves to bother anything.
> - It will reduce the effect of any possible leakage into the cable or
> connections up to the antenna connector, either from the generator or
from
> broadcast band signals or whatever.
>
> I suggest you make this thing up inside a twinax connector with a BNC
> connector fitted into the back end. This will provide a convenient
> divider/load for use with all your R-390 radios. The half ohm resistor
> (two one-ohm units in parallel perhaps) go from twinax pin to pin.
Ground
> one of them (there is a correct one to be grounded). Feed the other from
> the center pin of the BNC connector via the 50 ohm resistor. The BNC
> connector can be mounted into the cable clamping nut of the twinax
> connector either by filing the threads and force fitting or soldering, or
> by threading the clamping nut. (I think it's a 3/8 by 32 thread.) Allow
a
> flexible wire from BNC center connector to the 50 ohm resistor to allow
for
> threading the clamping nut into the connector body.
>
> Now, if you have a GR 1001A, use the 100 micro volt setting of the
> attenuator with no series resistor. If you use other settings of the
> attenuator, use the 40 ohm series unit. You have a generator system that
> delivers to the antenna terminals one percent of the voltage indicated on
> the panel. If you have a generator that operates correctly with the
cable
> terminated in 50 ohms, just use the cable from generator to voltage
> divider unit.
>
> The voltage at the antenna terminals will be one hundredth of the panel
> indication. The input impedance of the radio will not matter enough to
> bother. (The "output" impedance of the signal source is about one half
> ohm, and the input impedance of the radio is from 50 to 700 ohms.)
>
> >I assume that once this calculation is made,
>
> I did just above. It's convenient to divice the generator output
> indication by 100.
>
> >then when I feed the radio with a modulated AM signal with the BFO off
and
> >get -7V on the diode load, then I should be able to know the sensitivity
> >level, correct?
>
> Yes, correct. You will likely get DIFFERENT results if you use the method
> in the manuals, with a URM-25, for instance. It's likely the numbers
from
> the manual method will be from two thirds down to one half of the numbers
> from using a low-output-impedance attenuator as I describe above.
>
> The reason: An unterminated generator meant to indicate correctly if the
> cable IS terminated will deliver TWICE the indicated voltage at the end
of
> the cable. The receiver most likely has in input impedance above 50
ohms,
> possibly three to 14 times as high, and so will appear more or less like
an
> open circuit to the cable.
>
> A note on leakage: If you have an EICO, HEATH or other similar
generator,
> the question is not whether or not it leaks, the question is how
> much. Almost certainly it is leaking and the leaked signal probably ADDS
> to the signal from the end of the cable at the receiver input
> terminals. So the sensitivity readings you get will be misleading. To
see
> what it takes to get a moderately low leakage generator, examine the HP
606
> generators: every lead into and out of the oscillator box is filtered
> thoroughly, the box is cast aluminum with rf seals on every opening, the
> attenuator is similarly constructed, and so on. There have been reports
> that the common HP 8640 generator leaks somewhat unless it's seals and
> fastenings are cleaned and tight. To see what's going on with a
generator,
> put a nice 50 ohm load directly on the output connector and sniff around
> with your properly running receiver set to full gain.
>
> >The reason I ask is that I'm having to crank the generator up to around
> >10uV to do the "switch the modulation on and off to get 10dB S+N/N
readings
> >and that seems high.
>
> You may well have leakage from the generator. The 1001A leakage spec is
> "Fields at one mc are less that one microvolt per meter at two feet from
> the generator." Do test it and then take it mostly apart to clean,
tighten
> and reseal all and every place there might be leakage. One report from
our
> now-absent Nolan Lee told how he had to replace the coax inside the URM-
25,
> because it was leaky or lossy, and also the BNC-to-BNC cables that came
> with the thing were so lossy as to completely foul up any measurements.
>
> > The radio "hears" quite well, but I'm wondering just
> >how sensitive it really is.
>
> It sounds like really you don't know yet.
>
> >The problem I'm having with the "modulation on, modulation off" method,
is
> >that the cable and generator make a very, very good antenna, especially
on
> >the BC band, making these measurements quite difficult.
>
> Terminate the INPUT end of the cable with 50 ohms. Then try to figure out
> where the signals are getting into the radio. The generator set to a
high
> level with a few-turn loop on the end of another output cable can help
you
> find the route of signals into the radio. Bottom and top plates may
> help. De-Oxit on RF and IF connectors may help. (Compare a Mini-BNC
used
> in the R-390A with a General Radio 874 locking connector to get an idea
> what the differences are!)
>
> When I replace line cords on receivers, I locate a shielded computer cord
> (these are marked "shielded" and are a bit thicker than normal) and use
> that. Any R-390 which is running without its line filter may be leaking
> via the cord.
>
> Speaking of loops, GR made the 1001-P3 Voltage Divider,meant to inject
the
> correct CURRENT in series with a household radio loop antenna. This
thing
> is, I think, a 50:1 divider, and if you find one it could easily be
> modified to do the 100:1 division. Just add a one-ohm resistor across
the
> little wirewound card resistor you find in there.
>
> GR made a standard loop antenna (type 1000-P10) for use with the
> GR-1001A. It had the needed matching inside it, and was meant to create
a
> standard field for testing of loop-equipped radios.
>
> Also useful at times is the 1001-P4 Dummy Antenna. This thing was
defined,
> in the 30's I think, to simulate a wire antenna over the BCB-HF frequency
> range. The URM-25 manual and many other sources contain the details of
the
> thing (a little inductor, a resistor and two caps.)
>
> >Any advice here would be most appreciated.
>
> See the R-390A FAQ page for LOTS of manuals and such:
> http://209.35.120.129/faq-refs.htm
> Including the R-390/URR engineering report, the R-390 Cost Reduction
> report, and also the Mil Spec, which is at:
>
> Military Specification, MIL-R-13947B - Receiver, Radio (Radio Receiver
> R-390( )/URR) 1960-Oct-26
> http://209.35.120.129/mil-r-13947b.pdf
>
>
> There is a document: sensitivity_alignment.pdf that is also on the Pearls
> of Wisdom page
> http://209.35.120.129/Pearls/index.htm
> that is most helpful. It is also most long, but very good reading.
> http://209.35.120.129/Pearls/sensitivity_alignment(s).pdf
>
> Hewlett Packard, now Agilent, published many tutorials, tech notes and
such
> on their generators.
>
> The GR 1001A manual on BAMA is at:
> ftp://bama.sbc.edu/downloads/gr/1110a/
> (No home should be without a 1001A, and the manual.)
>
> (Comments, corrections, and discussion welcome.)
>
> Roy
> Who needs an output attenuator dual pot for his 1001A
Roy,
Lots of great info here (understand the updates to the 100 millivolt vs 100
microvolt settings). I bought some components and had intended to build
one of the 100:1 dividers and never got around to it. Looks like I need to
do that as it will make the measurements a bit easire (I think).
What I'm still a bit confused about is the fact that the receiver is
connected across the 1/2-ohm resistor. Isn't the radio seeing a pretty bad
impedence mismatch here? I realize this makes the generator immune to
impedence changes brought on by the receiver's input, but doesn't this
mismatch have a detrimental affect on the radio's ability to "see" the
voltage across the 1/2-ohm resistor?
Sorry if this sounds goofy, but I'm having a bit of a hard time
understanding all the impedence values and their effects in this setup.
Thanks again,
Barry - N4BUQ
More information about the R-390
mailing list