[R-390] Mechanical filter tests?
Charles A Taylor, WD4INP
wd4inp at isp.com
Sat Feb 17 17:07:57 EST 2007
At 12:32 PM 2/17/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>Thanks for the information, Charles and Bob. Unfortunately, I just did
>the realignment of the radio, including the trimmers on the filters, so
>that's not it. And right now I can't dive back into the radio- I put my
>wife off for a week while I recapped, and now I've got to dive into her
>project. Since I don't use the filter, I'm not doing anything right
>now. But I would like to sort out whether the spares I have are good.
>I'm using an HP 400 series voltmeter, which has a 1 Meg input impedance,
>probably similar to the grid of the tube. And I was using the
>unattenuated output from the URM-25, which I believe is high impedance.
>The strange thing is that I tried to trim the filter since the cap was
>gone, and got no change in throughput. On the output side the filter had
>a fixed cap. When I clipped the cap to connect a variable, the signal
>jumped about 6 dB, so the insertion loss was only 6 dB. I certainly
>didn't expect that! There must have been a test setup for the filters
>prior to installation into the radio- anyone know about it?
>Ed WB2LHI
Ed,
The filters were consistent in their characteristics. Ought not to have
been a "selected value" sort of situation.
Appears from what you write that the input capacitor that parallels the
trimmer has been removed, and a wrong value was been selected to parallel
the output trimmer. You need to hand-select the proper values.
Navy manual calls for 110 pF total capacitance across either side of the
filter. My Motorola has 8-50 pF trimmer either side. That implies somewhere
near 47 pf
for the fixed padding capacitor.
Suggest that as a starting point.
I'm putting this on the reflector for informational purposes.
73,
Charles
-----
Charles A Taylor, WD4INP
Greenville, North Carolina
More information about the R-390
mailing list