[R-390] Detector tests followup
Cecil Acuff
chacuff at cableone.net
Wed Sep 20 08:59:39 EDT 2006
Need to try that same test and back up to pin 1 on T503. If .33V at that
point gives you proper level at Pin 7 of V507 then the problem is either in
T503 or a bad V506 the 5814/12AU7. (swap it with V206 out of the calibrator
for a test)
Check for a 6 ohm reading across pins 1 and 2 of T503 and an open circuit
between pins 1 and/or 2 and the remaining pins of T503. It's possible L513
in T503 could be open...or shorted to a turn of L512.
As a long shot you could lift one end of C535 and see if isolating the BFO
circuitry has any effect.
Getting close...
Cecil...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry" <n4buq at knology.net>
To: <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: [R-390] Detector tests followup
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff at cableone.net>
> To: <n4buq at knology.net>; <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [R-390] Detector tests followup
>
>
>> Did you record the signal level required at terminal 15 to get the .15v
>> at
>> pin 7 of V507? Just curious whether it took just a bit more level or
>> something closer to 4v p-p.
>>
>> Simple test for C530....cut one end of it loose but where you can solder
> it
>> back. See if that brings the signal level up. C530 and L502 are used to
>> remove the 455kc signal from the audio...
>>
>> It could also be a bad T503 secondary or C562. Pull the cover off T503
> and
>> inject your AUDIO signal into pin 1 of T503 with the diode load jumper
> back
>> in place and see what you get.
>>
>> I would also do a continuity test of the cable from terminal 14 back to
> pin
>> 1 of T503 and center to ground etc....
>>
>> One thing that don't add up is that you were originally injecting .1V at
>> Pins 6,7 of V506B and expecting to see the equivalent of .15v of audio at
>> Pin 7 of V507 where you just had to crank the level going in at the diode
>> load point to achieve .15 volts of signal at Pin 7 of V507. Those number
>> don't add up. Where did you get the .1V of 455kc at the plate of V506B
>> from...out of the manual somewhere? My manual is showing a level of .3
>> to
>> .4 V at pin 1 (grid) of the 4th IF amp V504. I don't see anything
> showing
>> the expected output on of that IF amp is but I would expect it to be
> fairly
>> high to drive a decent signal through T503. I haven't found any expected
>> level at the input of the detector so far....but something approaching 1
>> volt p-p might not be unreasonable.....100mv sounds low but I haven't
>> measured a working radio that I remember. The signal substitution
>> process
>> in my manual speaks only in general terms as to the levels to inject in
> this
>> area...things like sufficient signal level to achieve an output etc....
>>
>> Cecil....
>
> I did another test tonight. I coupled the audio generator to terminal 15
> and measured the voltage it required to get 0.15V at pin 7 of V506. It
> was
> approximately 0.33V. I assume that would be about right given the voltage
> drop across the grid resistor going to the limiter circuit.
>
> Next, I shorted the diode-load terminals and watched the voltage on pin 7
> of
> V507. It only dropped about 0.01V. Given the fact that it takes 4V p-p
> on
> the plate of the detector to see 0.15V on pin 7 of V507, I sort of
> expected
> to see a good drop in voltage when I included the diode-load connection.
>
> I suppose I'll try subbing the 150pF to see what effect it has, but I'm
> beginning to think this isn't the problem. I have some 180pF so until I
> get
> the right value, this should at least give me an indication if this is the
> problem point.
>
> Thanks guys. I do hope to get to the bottom of this...
>
> Barry - N4BUQ
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
>
More information about the R-390
mailing list