[R-390] SWL antenna

Transmaster 22hornet at gmail.com
Wed Nov 8 13:22:08 EST 2006


You know something that is a excellent idea.  I happen to be
rebuilding my transmission HF dipole antenna and am looking through
all of the possible designs and I found Fair Radio sales has twinax
cable. here is the catalog description; .

Twisted Twin Axial RF cable with braided silver shield Both conductors
are 24 gauge with 19 strands per conductor. Cable rated at 77 ohm
impedance. Light blue jacket. #WT-24, $25.00/100ft; $95.00/500ft.

The search term I used was to find this item is "antenna wire"

Now I have a question;  Has anyone out there used field telephone wire
for antenna wire?
I am looking at this stuff it is cheap. the conductors are some kind
of steel.  It isn't the easiest stuff work with but I have seen this
stuff in the field that has been in use for decades. You can get this
wire in mile long spools for a really cheap price.



On 11/8/06, Tim  Shoppa <tshoppa at wmata.com> wrote:
> John Kolb wrote:
> >At 04:37 PM 11/6/2006, Dan Merz wrote:
>
> >>  But I've been
> >>wondering about the transmission line across and inside the attic
> house
> >>about 40 feet across and down about 16 feet into the basement.  My
> first
> >>idea was to use one of the better .240 diam coax types either 50 or
> 75 ohms
> >>but then I starting reading about losses when mismatch exists and
> thought
> >>maybe RG8 might be worthwhile.  Or will I be just as well off using
> the
> >>cheap 300 ohm foam twin lead that I now use.
>
> >The RG-8 won't work any better than the smaller coax and will be
> >a lot stiffer and harder to handle
>
> >>  I don't expect much noise from
> >>things in the house but do know the current washer is a problem when
> it's on
> >>- probably has more electronic controls than the older one that I had
> for
> >>years with mechanical switching.  My current system picks that up
> because
> >>the lead-in wire drapes over toward the laundry room.  But I can hear
> it on
> >>a portable am radio operating on its internal antenna as well.  I
> usually
> >>lose interest in listening when the washing machine is running.
>
> >Coax instead of twin lead should help with pickup from local QRM such
> as
> >washing machines.  Noise of your current washer probably comes from
> >the motor, not the controls.
>
> To build on top of what John and Roy have said:
>
> Even better than coax is twinax or whatever they call shielded
> balanced line today. I got a bunch and it works wonders on
> MW and LW along with a magnetically shielded loop antenna.
> Loops have a very real advantage in that they have a deep
> null that is useful for eliminating a single point source of
> interference. For the higher SW bands I have a dipole in
> the air connected via the twinax. In all cases the reduction
> in local RFI is profound compared to coax (worst) or coax
> and a balun (slightly better than just coax but still not wonderful).
>
> And the twinax is wonderful for use with the 390A, with
> it's balanced antenna jack. You're using it exactly as it was
> designed. Remember that the 390A was often used with noisy
> mobile generators and in environments with lots of noise.
>
> Twinax is often found surplus (meaning you should dumpster-dive!)
> from IBM mainframe deinstallations, or you can buy it in quantity
> and new on E-bay or other places.
>
> Tim.
> _____________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
>


-- 
Kenneth A. Crips, W7ITC Home of the Chew Crew,  Red Headed
Irish Terrier House Ninjas, Beezie, Chic', and Cowboy
10th degree black belts in Mouch Fue, Bed Fue, and
Con Artist Fue.


More information about the R-390 mailing list