[R-390] AVC voltages revisited
Jim M.
jmiller1706 at cfl.rr.com
Thu May 18 22:22:16 EDT 2006
I have noted that if there is oil or conductive film residue on some tube
sockets, on some RF switch wafers (that carry AGC), or especially the
insulated antenna trimmer shaft, then the AGC control may tend to be
degraded in the RF deck. Over spraying RF deck switches or luibricating the
antenna trimmer shaft can cause this. The residue can be removed by "Big
Bath" or equivalent moisture displacement spray. Leaky AGC line bypass caps
can also be suspect. It's a high impedance circuit so it doesnt take much.
Jim N4BE
----- Original Message -----
From: <DJED1 at aol.com>
To: <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:01 PM
Subject: [R-390] AVC voltages revisited
> Just a tidbit for anyone else who is investigating the AVC line: As I
> mentioned before, I disconnected the cable to the RF module and made some
> resistance measurements, which I thought indicated a leaky cap. As I was
> listening
> to the radio last night, I was browsing through the Y2K manual (a great
> job).
> I was surprised to see that the RF amp schematic was different than in my
> old TM, and the differences accounted for the irregularities in
> resistance
> measurements. Specifically, the newer manual shows a 1.5M resistor from
> the AVC
> line to ground in the RF module, while the old TM shows no path to
> ground.
> Since the new schematic agrees exactly with my resistance measurements, I
> assume I'm all OK with the capacitors, and don't need to pull the RF
> deck.
> Ed
> _____________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
More information about the R-390
mailing list