[R-390] HP410B rectifier tubes
n4buq at knology.net
n4buq at knology.net
Mon Mar 27 07:49:35 EST 2006
It has an EA53 in it. I glanced at my other meter's (ME-26) 2-01C and it
didn't appear at first glance that the 2-01C would fit in my HP-410B's
probe, but I'll give it a second look. Maybe someone put an EA53 in this
probe and I'm just assuming a 2-01C won't fit. It sure would be great if
it does as the 2-01C is generally a less-expensive tube these days.
73,
Barry - N4BUQ
> Barry,
>
> You sure you don't want a 2-O1C? That's what I have in my 410B. You
> can use the EA53 but it requires a different plate contact and attaching
> spring. Also the filament voltage is different. Don't know if HP made
> a design change or if they just allowed for a different repair part. I
> have an NOS HP replacement part, 2-O1C. Let me know if you are
interested.
>
> 73,
>
> Bill, K3PGB
>
> Barry wrote:
>
> >Did some more digging. With the cover off, I can measure the filament
> >voltage for the EA53 while it is in circuit. I had to crank the resistor
> >quite a bit farther "up" to get 6.3VAC across the filament. This did
cause
> >the probe to get really warm like it used to; however, the probe still
> >doesn't check AC properly (low reading).
> >
> >I did some checking in the manual. It states to check the resistance
> >"below" the ballast tube with the ballast tube removed from the circuit.
> >This should produce 4 to 6 ohms. If it doesn't, most likely something
has
> >been "shorted" (I assume it means something has damaged the rectifier).
> >Mine checks a little over 2 ohms, regardless of the setting of the
variable
> >resistor. Looks like I probably do have a damaged EA53. I checked the
rest
> >of the wiring and some of the test point voltages and nothing was
> >particularly too badly awry.
> >
> >Looks like I'm back to looking for an EA53 :-(
> >
> >Brry - N4BUQ
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the R-390
mailing list