[R-390] 6BJ6/6BH6 sub

[n4buq at knology.net]

Okay.  I had them reversed.  I thought that didn't make sense, but now it 
does.

Thanks!

Barry

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:23:37 -0500, "Tim  Shoppa" <tshoppa at wmata.com> 
wrote :

> > Okay, now it's time to educate me on this issue.  If the 6BH6 is a
> remote
> > cutoff tube, then it won't go into cutoff as "early" as the sharp
> cutoff
> > 6BJ6, right?
> 
> Other way around: 6BJ6 is remote cutoff, 6BH6 is sharp cutoff.
> 
> The 6BJ6 was the original IF tube. 6BH6 is the sub.
> 
> >  If that's the case, then why will you see distortion on strong 
> > signals with the remote cutoff tube?
> 
> Actually either will distort with very strong signals. And when
> you're subbing around it's likely that biases etc will be quite
> unoptimal for critical use.
> 
> Tim.
> _____________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
> 
> 
>