[R-390] Y2K Manual and CV-591
Bonddaleena at aol.com
Bonddaleena at aol.com
Mon Nov 14 18:01:40 EST 2005
In a message dated 11/14/2005 11:27:11 AM Eastern Standard Time,
roy.morgan at nist.gov writes:
At 10:25 PM 11/11/2005, Bonddaleena at aol.com wrote:
>
>I intend to start 'going through' my working and very mint '67 EAC.
Ron,
Good for you. I also have a nice EAC-67 here. Mine is kaput, but I'll get
it working nicely when I get to it.
>...I have the very nice Y2K Manual. I
> was just wondering if anyone has an 'erratta' list for the Manual.
First, make sure you have the "Release 2" version. It is here:
http://www.r-390a.net/Y2K-R2/
On that page is a set of errata for the Release 1, but as far as I know
they have all been accounted for in Release 2.
There may well have been some errors detected in Release 2, but I don't
know of a list of them.
> I do have a couple of questions on the 591A........
>
>1. For some bizzare reason, the USB and LSB positions appear to be
reversed.
This is an oddity but not unexpected. The thing can be used with receivers
that either reverse the sideband sense or do not reverse it. This comes
from the local oscillator being above or below the mixer input
frequency. The manual for the 591 talks about this situation. You man have
discovered that the way to "switch" the thing is to reverse the bulb covers
on the two indicator lamps!
>I had to switch xtals to get it to detect the SSB signals as indicated on
>the front panel. According to the 591A Manual, the xtals were in the correct
>position, but I had to switch them, to get it to function correctly.
Good if it works for you, fine. The whole thing is a bit of a puzzle for
me, at least, even though you'd think it was easy to understand and keep
straight.
>Could the 390A be THAT far out of alignment? The audio sounds great with
the
>xtal swap, but......somethin' ain't right.
I suggest you get a signal generator and do a little experimenting. Think
slowly. Turn the knob slowly. Get clear in your head where the signal
generator is with respect to the passband and the local oscillator(s)
For example: if you tune your signal generator from ABOVE the frequency the
receiver is tuned to, and the first audio you hear it HIGH frequency (like
2-3 kc) and decreasing, then your signal generator signal is above the
tuned frequency and you are in the upper sideband.
> 2. Never having used this combo before, I was VERY disappointed with the
>audio output of the 591A.
I think you are not the only one. I suggest you make VERY sure that the
coupling caps in the 591 are replaced: especially the ones in the audio
section. ALL, repeat ALL EACH AND EVERY ONE of the coupling/bypass caps in
my CV-591are leaky. In the audio section, this causes excessive plate
current in the audio output tube. In particular, C20 and C24, both 0.01 uF
may be leaky. C24 especially may be leaking and driving the 6AQ5 plate
current way up, causing lots of distortion and weak audio. Test also C25
and R24, cathode bypass and dropping resistor for the 6AQ5. Measure the
cathode voltage to be sure nothing is amiss. replace all three of these
caps, unless C25 is a paper oil (2 uF) and is not leaky or defunct. Try
feeding audio into the thing at the appropriate place to see if the whole
audio section is workingl. Modulated 455 kc from the signal generator will
tell you a lot, too.
> I have to use an outboard audio amp to get decent
>volume.
Notice that the audio output section is configurable for "low level"
output (150 mW)or "high level" (2 W) and also can drive 8 ohms or 600
ohms. Dope that out in your mind and get it set up straight. The switch
that does this is on the chassis near the rear terminal strip, I think.
> Tubes are good, been recapped, voltages normal etc. Any thoughts? I do
>have a junker 591A I picked up because the filter choke in mine was fried.
Of course you don't need the junker now, so send it to me.. thanks. (heheh)
> I don't mind using the outboard amp. In the same rack, is a 51J-3 with a
>solid state (Ron Hankins?) SSB adapter. Of course, this one absolutely
>needs an outboard amp.
You mean the 51J-3 absolutely needs an outboard amp, or the SSB adapter
needs it? I have an R-388 that I have not yet got running, so that's why I
ask.
> I just thought the 591 with it's 6AQ5 audio tube should provide as much
> volume as my other boatanchors which use the same tube.....
That makes sense, but it may simply be lame by design. How does it sound
with good earphones??
Roy
- Roy Morgan, K1LKY since 1959 - Keep 'em Glowing!
7130 Panorama Drive, Derwood MD 20855
Home: 301-330-8828 Cell 301-928-7794
Work: Voice: 301-975-3254, Fax: 301-948-6213
roy.morgan at nist.gov --
_____________________________________________________________
R-390 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
Unsubscribe: _http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390_
(http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390)
Hi Roy, good to hear from you again.... We corresponded a couple of years
ago, when I was N4KCM.
I always respected your answers.
I had a couple of R-388s and loved them. I eventually came across this mint
51J-3 so it became a 'keeper'. Sorry for the confusion about it's audio...
No, the radio has PLENTY of audio. Ron's adapter is plugged into the 500KHz
out jack and it have virtually no audio, but a flea market audio amp works
perfectly!
I poked around under the 61J-3 and lo and behold, no paper caps to change!
They are all dogbones. The sensitivity even on 10M is amazing!!!
On the 591, I replaced every cap in there. It works great, except it has low
audio.
I use Dr. Jerry's method of cap checking and it is fantastic!
regards,
ron
N4UE
More information about the R-390
mailing list