[R-390] Re: Depot Dawgs
Dan Arney
hankarn at pacbell.net
Mon Jul 25 14:38:28 EDT 2005
Barry, You may have been lurking in the shade but you missed it
somewhere back down the road,
I have been on most of these list when there was only one Barry,
I do not remember anyone talking about the depot overhauls other than a
couple that had some QC problems.
IIRC the term "Depot Dawg" came about in the discussion of the process
that all of the, in this case RADIO's went through.
Like all of the modules, parts, tags, panels and frames went on there
merry way throughout the process and after be checked they all came back
together, shook hands with new family members i.e. Collins, Eac, S-W etc
hey lets all work together and down the road they went. My guess they
all met specs at least but some of them happened to have better genetics
so they performed better, less wrist power, better audio, etc. etc.
It all boiled down to some Purist wanting an all Collins, or whoever
brand with matching S/N or some nitpicking category that had no bearing
on the performance of the subject radio.
I do not remember anyone badmouthing any of the Techs. at any time.
Radios are just like Caddies, Rolls, Fords they all somewhere had and
have and will continue to have LEMONS and I do not mean a twist with the
Scotch & Water either.
So if your feelings are hurt maybe you should consider lurking until you
have all of the facts,
And last but not least I am not a moron as you implied about some of us
that use the term DEPOT DAWG. I believe in doing things correctly and up
to specs With over 20,000 hours in my flight log flying J-2 Cubs through
Boeing 747's had to do something correct.
I feel you owe the list an apology.
Hank
KN6DI
little more than .02 worth.
More information about the R-390
mailing list