[R-390] More On Low Audio Problem
Jim M.
jmiller1706 at cfl.rr.com
Sat Dec 17 13:44:41 EST 2005
Ask yourself, what could have happened when the front panel was removed and
replaced. There are large cable bundles that get flexed when you remove the
panel. I have broken many wires going to gain pots in the process of
removing the panel. Something could have happened to a wire on the audio
pot of wide/narrow switch. Sometimes the twi multipin connectors to the AF
module work loose. Hopefully a wire wasn't crimped under the panel when you
replaced it.
JM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff at cableone.net>
To: <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [R-390] More On Low Audio Problem
> Got a bit crosseyed....should have said 1 and 7 not 1 and 6....
>
> Cecil...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff at cableone.net>
> To: "Frederick Bray" <fwbray at mminternet.com>; <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 11:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [R-390] More On Low Audio Problem
>
>
>> Fred,
>>
>> In the wide position the response switch S-104 should be already
>> shorting pin 1 to pin 6. If you are using a clip lead to connect pins 1
>> and 6 and it restores audio you have a bad contact on S-104 or a broken
>> wire between pins 3 and 9.
>>
>> Looks like you are close...
>>
>> I didn't have a schematic for the 390A from the shop but used the pull
>> out in the TM11-4000 that was already on my desk here in the house. I
>> hope the designations are correct...I believe the schmatic to be.
>>
>> Cecil....
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Frederick Bray" <fwbray at mminternet.com>
>> To: <r-390 at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 11:40 AM
>> Subject: [R-390] More On Low Audio Problem
>>
>>
>>> First, let me thank everyone who has replied -- both on and off list.
>>>
>>> I think I have narrowed the problem down to the first AF amp/cathode
>>> follower. I would appreciate it if those who are more experienced that
>>> I with the 390A can confirm that I am on the right track.
>>>
>>> I used an audio signal generator to ascertain that a signal injected at
>>> the local and line level controls seems to produce a normal audio
>>> output.
>>>
>>> Using a VTVM, I confirmed that on there is an AC voltage on terminal 1
>>> of the wide/sharp switch and that I can trace this voltage through the
>>> switch. Jumpering this voltage to terminal 6 on the switch seems to
>>> restore the audio level to approximately normal, or at least much closer
>>> to normal.
>>>
>>> From looking at the schematic, I think that what I am doing is bypassing
>>> the first AF/cathode follower and going directly to the local and line
>>> AF amps.
>>>
>>> Does this make sense?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Fred Bray
>>> KE6CD
>>> _____________________________________________________________
>>> R-390 mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>>> Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
>>>
>>
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________
>> R-390 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
>> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>> Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
> Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
>
More information about the R-390
mailing list