[R-390] R-390 Balanced Antenna Input
Bjarne Mjelde
bjarne at mjelde.net
Sun Jun 27 05:23:26 EDT 2004
Being a very new (and still unexperienced) R-390A user, I may not have
much to contribute to this thread. However, some may find this of
interest:
Using the balanced input significantly increases sensitivity over the
unbalanced input in my setting. My setting is: 550 meter beverage,
coax-fed via a 1:9 transformer to a BNC connector. Monitoring the
Mediumwave. When using the unbalanced input, signal recovery was
noticeably lower than that of the JRC NRD-545 (which acted as a sort of
"reference receiver" since the sensitivity figures of it is known, i.e.
0.4 - 0.5 uV in AM Mediumwave, 6 kHz bw, 30% mod). I monitored stations
on, or just above the noise floor. When I utilized the balanced input via
the UG971/U and UG636A/U, signal recovery was noticeably better than the
NRD-545. I have no idea if this means that the balanced input is
significantly more sensitive than the unbalanced input; however signal
recovery indicate that it is indeed the case.
The short version of the above: I will never use the unbalanced antenna
input for my beverages.
--
From The World's Northernmost DX-er
Bjarne Mjelde
Berlevag, Arctic Norway
www.kongsfjord.no
More information about the R-390
mailing list