[R-390] RE: HSR-2 vs 390a

Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:24:14 -0600

Greetings,

        The article on the HSR-2 was purely subjective in my opinion...and
after reading it again yesterday I realized I know the subjective.  I
participated on another list about Jaguar auto's with him for a year or so
and bumped into him almost daily there!  (I finally bailed out)

In my opinion there was not enough analytical work done in any of what I
read for me to be convinced...realizing fully that specifications often
differ greatly from real world but they often give a clue!

Cecil....
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bryce Ringwood" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:59 AM
Subject: Re: [R-390] RE: HSR-2 vs 390a

> Hi all,
>
> This is strange. I have a fair selection of radios with LC filters and
> 6BE6 or worse mixer tubes. As far as sensitivity goes and AM
> listenability, the R-390A is as good or better than most. Did the ER
> article have any measured comparisons, or was it subjective ? Could it
> be that the HSR-2 was happy with the antenna set up and the 390 wasn't ?
> Anyhow, I'm not about to modify the 390a IF strip in a hurry. I look
> forward to hearing about the subsequent articles.
>
> - Bryce
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>