[R-390] Autotuners
Sandy Geiger
chg111 at hotmail.com
Thu Dec 30 20:59:02 EST 2004
Lemme 'splain somethin to y'all-I was in NO way casting dispersions on
the quality of Rick's restoration. Rick knows me, knows that I have NO
mechanical/electrical aptitude atall,he was just trying to keep me
from possibly ruining one of these rare gems. I'm just a dumb ol'
hillbilly who has a jones for these things called R-3XXs, I can kinda
tell you how one works, but the finer points are WAY above my head.
Unlike a lot of you, I didn't have the benefit of working on these
things in the Army or whatever-I just got into 'em 'cause I think
they're kewl as all get-out. I don't know why we bother w/'em,
though-broadband over power lines is gonna clean our clocks in a few
years, & shit, there's nothin to listen to anymore anyhow than a bunch
of mealy-mouth preachers, political kooks, junk like that. But please,
don't think I was bad mouthin' Rick-I MOST CERTAINLY wasn't. -Sandy
G.
C.H.(Sandy)Geiger III
>From: "Drew Papanek" <drewmaster813 at hotmail.com>
>To: r-390 at mailman.qth.net
>Subject: [R-390] Autotuners
>Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:38:00 -0500
>
>Hello,
>
>Sandy Geiger expressed misgivings about firing up the autotune on
>his Mish-restored R-391:
>
>>Guys- I have an R-391, s/n 282, that I got from Rick
>>Mish.
>>Electronically, it is tweaked to the nines,as all Rick's
>>restorations
>>are, but I've never been brave-or foolish-enuff to fire up
>>the
>>Autotune. Rick kinda suggested it would be in my-& the radio's-
>>best
>>interests if I left it alone. Too many tales of R-391s
>>eating
>>themselves have convinced me this is the right thing to do.-Sandy
>>G.
>
>He cited Barry's observations:
>
>>It is impossible to walk this gizmo through manually in steps,
>>though you can put a bristol wrench in the synch >adjuster, lock
>>the knobs down and rotate it. However, it's not a complete
>>simulation as the relay and control unit
>>aren't doing their things. It's all hard-wired together --
>>including the relay -- no socket.
>
>I was able to manually operate the autotune and exercise the
>electrical portion of an ART-13 by mechanically disconnecting the
>motor from the rest of the autotune. With power applied and channel
>selected, the motor would run until I had turned the shaft (many
>turns!) to operate the limit sensing switch, whereupon the relay
>would pull in and the motor would reverse; running until I had
>turned the shaft enough(the other direction) to operate the channel
>position sensing switch (too lazy to go get the manual and see what
>they call those switches).
>
>Yes, the slip clutches were frozen with gummed-up lubricant and I
>did not force the movement. Who knows what damage would have
>resulted had I tested under motor power. Disassembly, soaking in
>lacquer thinner, relubrication and reassembly corrected the problem.
>
>I don't think I used a synthetic lubricant; the process will
>therefore have to be repeated in another 20 years or so.
>
>There is a special tool for turning the ART-13 autotune line shaft;
>I did not have the tool but it was a simple matter to make one up.
>
>It would be a simple matter to lower voltage to the motor to reduce
>the torque for testing purposes (for the R-391, back on topic,
>whew!).
>
>I used an old Telco power supply salvaged from the junkheap for the
>24VDC - no construction required there.
>
>Drew
>
>
>_____________________________________________________________
>Win a new Icom IC-756PROIII and help QSL/QTH.net
>Details at: http://mailman.qth.net/index.html
>_____________________________________________________________
>R-390 mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
>Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
More information about the R-390
mailing list