[R-390] 390() vs 390(A)
Sandy Geiger
chg111 at hotmail.com
Wed Dec 29 20:20:32 EST 2004
Well, for one thing, I don't have the-what izzit- PP-629 power supply
to make the beastie run. ONLY one I ever saw went for something over
$300 on You-Know-Where last fall. And yes, I guess you could make one
up, but I have neither the skills or knowledge-or INCLINATION- to do
so. The radio is an EXCELLENT specimen, I don't particularly want to
take a chance on it's getting trashed. They only made, what, 1300 or
so of them things, & sometime after I've long since taken my Eternal
Dirt Nap,some radio nut who hasn't even been born yet will hopefully
be enjoying this marvel of 1950s mechanical & thermionic technology.
Much as we enjoy Stradivaiuses today. Sure, I'd like to see an R-391's
Autotune run, just not necessarily MY R-391's Autotune.-Sandy G.
C.H.(Sandy)Geiger III
>From: polaraligned <polaraligned at optonline.net>
>CC: r-390 at mailman.qth.net
>Subject: Re: [R-390] 390() vs 390(A)
>Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:56:49 -0500
>
>
>
>
> Rick kinda suggested it would be in my-& the radio's- best
> > interests if I left it alone. Too many tales of R-391s
eating
> > themselves have convinced me this is the right thing to
do.-Sandy G.
> > C.H.(Sandy)Geiger III
>
>
>If the radio is restored and properly assembled, why not fire it up?
>What is there that could go wrong on a properly restored Autotune?
>Is this just lack of confidence in one's work?
>Is there not risk to firing up any old radio after restoration?
>Do I ask too many questions?
>
>
>Scott
>
>
>_____________________________________________________________
>Win a new Icom IC-756PROIII and help QSL/QTH.net
>Details at: http://mailman.qth.net/index.html
>_____________________________________________________________
>R-390 mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
>Post: mailto:R-390 at mailman.qth.net
>Unsubscribe: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/r-390
More information about the R-390
mailing list